Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

You are right, there was almost no sex in the dorms then and very little outside. I think those days were protective and friendly and good for women myself. But I am old.


365 posted on 09/29/2010 6:58:49 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: cajungirl

Three or even two generations ago many girls did not want to be known as “easy” or get pregnant outside of marriage. They wanted to be known as “good” girls. Marriage and family were the goal for most girls.

Now family is getting destroyed and virtue is sneered at, like on this thread.

People often think that the encroachment of immorality is inevitable and a good thing (more access for them, I guess). But it can and I am sure and certain will be turned around. People who act like sluts with no respect for themselves and others are miserable people and raise messed up kids (the ones they don’t abort). And then society has a huge underclass of feral humans who grow up without a stable family and married mother and father. It is ruining this country and others as well, like the UK.


370 posted on 09/29/2010 7:03:36 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

To: cajungirl
Guess again

For single white women between the ages of 20 and 24, the frequency of premarital pregnancies more than doubled from the mid-1940s to the mid-1950s.

374 posted on 09/29/2010 7:09:12 PM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson