Notice: Do not post anything from Debbie Schlussel com or anything written by her (2010)

Jim Robinson

[antceecee]

Excuse me? Why are you posting this reply to my post #14?

[mnehring]

bwc2221 was pretty accurate in what he posted, at that, Debbie has the correction posted on the article's link. He used some different terms, but he wasn't lying. Debbie was backpedaling.

[Monkey Face]

Give her a dose of her own medicine. Whiney little *blankety*. Free Republic stands for FREEDOM!! (No cowards allowed.)

[Monkey Face]

What has been seen....can’t be unseen....

[Godzilla]

She has eaten the equivalent of several small countries since then.

ouch!

[Godzilla]

What has been seen....can’t be unseen....

[Monkey Face]

See???

LOL!

Thanks! (I love the Muppets!)

[Mr. Silverback]

What does she think she is, a classy green eyed blonde?

As a Christian social conservative, I invite Ms. Schlussel to pound sand.

[rolling_stone]

Now I REALLY want to hit it.

looks like somebody already beat you to it and they used the old ugly stick...

[Eaker]

butt snorkeling hack

I bet you would aim right for the snorkel!

[Vigilanteman]

She is the one that speaks in foam flecked invective like a rabid dog; and whose face looks like the north end of a south bound dog.

You've just described 80% of the women in the MSM. While your description is funny, it is about as helpful as describing your average Asian as "short with black hair."

[allmendream]

OK, she is the one from the far far radical “right” (if zenophobia and reactionary nativism is accepted to be “right”, which I reject), instead of the far far radical left.

[aruanan]

turgid load

Whoa. Don't make me whip my Church Lady pic out on ya, now!!!

Ha ha. For some reason, seeing them isolated, those two words seem to go really well together.

[Jim Robinson]

Today’s email from Debbie:

Sorry, Jim, but you cannot “leave it to bwc2221 to decide” whether or not he gets to defame me. You may think this is a game, but like I said, you had an hour to remove his defamatory information, and you refused. I guess I’m going to have to take you to court. I take defamation very seriously and pursue it. See ya in court. And have fun paying my attorney’s fees and yours. You have absolutely no legal leg to stand on here. Did I mention I’m an attorney who practices, among other things, First Amendment law? Here’s a tip: the First Amendment does not protect defamatory speech. Good luck. I made a simple request. Being the obviously inadequate and insecure person you indicate you are, you responded with insults and obscenities because I dared tell the truth about your empty idol, Sarah Palin. If you can’t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. And if you can’t remove defamatory information per a demand letter, you won’t be staying out of court. I’ve taken screen shots of the defamatory comments, and they remain up. If they remain up and you haven’t posted a retraction in a prominent spot on FR when I’m done with my federal complaint, I will file it. Get a lawyer.

Debbie Schlussel
Attorney at Law

PS, Jim:
FYI, regardless of whether or not you remove bwc2221’s defamatory comments, I will be suing him as well and seeking his identity in federal court. Good luck with that. I tolerate some pretty harsh stuff written about me on your website and everywhere else (and being the wimp that you are, you can’t tolerate even a measured response, per your double standard). But I will never tolerate defamation of my work by your site, by one of your commenters, or by any other party. I’ve always made a practice of pursuing such transgressions. Usually, though, the defaming website has the good sense to remove the defamatory information and post a retraction. The law is on my side here. Only a stubborn fool would ignore it.

[Tijeras_Slim]

I think you’re getting to her.

[aruanan]

Wow! Speaking of a "turgid load"!

[Godzilla]

Me me ME ME me!

[whatshotandwhatsnot]

Good grief! Not many are as filled with such self importance as is this nobody. Never heard of her until now and count myself quite fortunate.

Fine example of a yet another thin skinned “Constitutional” legal type. There must be a course online somewhere since they’re coming out of the woodwork.

[GreenAccord]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. Except when Debbie Schlussel, Attorney at Law, is involved. Then it's subsisto quod desino, buster!

[Brad’s Gramma]

She who shall not be named wrote this:

"Here’s a tip: the First Amendment does not protect defamatory speech. Good luck. I made a simple request. Being the obviously inadequate and insecure person you indicate you are....."

Just sayin'