Replies

"Which again makes me wonder why you think that nobody should mock the stuff you post, or why you are so upset that I choose to hold a negative opinion about the value of what the people say in some of the articles you post."

You say the same thing everyday about the same sites...as if no-one read it yesterday or the day before.

After a while it seems the intent is to disrupt.

Why not let the reader make his own judgement about the quality of the article or the publishing site?

I seriously doubt that I say the same thing, or any thing, on any of your threads on a typical day. I usually just skip them. Occasionally, something in them is interesting enough to make a comment on, and in the one you cited earlier, I actually was interested enough to click through and see what really was being said -- which is where I got the comment from the comments section.

You may wish I take a great interest in your reposting of page after page of entries from these pages, but I generally do not.

I only occasionally am moved to mock something they say. And if you think this occasional derision of the posts from those sites is obtrusive, just be glad you don't post stuff from the gold bugs. I actually frequent them on a more regular basis than your threads.

Why not let the reader make his own judgement about the quality of the article or the publishing site?

You've got to be kidding, right? You know that this is FreeRepublic, right? The site where everybody passes judgment on everything?

You have made me laugh. Let readers make their OWN judgments? that's a good one. Next thing you know, you'll want a flag to disable comments or something. ha.

Seriously, I wish the moderators would add a new category for hyperintensive financial newsletter postings, so they could all be collected in one place and not be posted as news/activism all the time.

(Wouldn't matter to me, of course, because I read every thread that is posted. I'm just that good.)