Posted on 09/28/2010 10:49:35 AM PDT by Deo volente
A federal appeals court in San Francisco late Monday ordered a trial judge to reconsider a ruling that allowed for a convicted murderer and rapist to be executed this week at San Quentin State Prison.
Albert Greenwood Brown was scheduled to die at 9 p.m. Thursday for the 1980 killing of a 15-year-old Riverside girl.
But the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel erred by offering Brown a choice of a one-drug lethal injection or a three-drug cocktail.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
This bastard raped and murdered this girl that long ago, and now this stupid-assed court says that to offer him two choices for execution is wrong!
Earlier on FOX I heard that California had only on dose of the Lethal Injection Drug and it expires on Thursday, and there is a nation wide shortage on the drug. So this guy isnt going to die anytime soon.
Ah, yes a manufactured appeal because all the real ones had failed. Exactly what is the legal remedy for offering a choice of cocktail? BTW, in what way does that prejudice the finding of guilt?
I recommend that the Justices try both kinds on themselves to find out which is preferable. We’re willing to wait for their answer.
Actually, the court has it right: he should have got a bullet through his head, delivered by the father, two seconds after his guilt was apparent.
But, me being me, I’d have started with a .22 LR on his ankles...
After all, I can afford the extra ammo, and the results would be the same. And it wouldn’t take thirty years.
What a bunch of garbage.
My prediction is there will not be another execution in California for at least five years. I hope I'm wrong.
1 small high speed injection of lead poisoning.
“But the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel erred by offering Brown a choice of a one-drug lethal injection or a three-drug cocktail.”
I would have offered him a four strand or a five strand rope.
[Hanging is environmentally friendly - no air polluting gas fumes, no lead pollution, no dangerous drugs, no waste of valuable electricity - AND the rope is recyclable :) ]
I wonder if Judge Fogel did this on purpose, knowing the appeals court would probably strike it down.
These judges are out of control and a serious threat to our freedom.
Partial responsibility for this BS lies in the Catholic church. In late 2001, as part of the mass, they started rote-praying for an end to the death penalty.
Thirty years. And the Left is clueless about “rage from the Right.” Liberalism is truly a mental illness that results in people being murdered.
This is not a case of a faulty conviction, so proceed.
Otherwise, we send the message to murderers that innocent life is their playground and that society doesn’t care.
UnF’ing believable! How about a bullet or 2 between the eyes or a good string rope? Even better they should execute him like he did this young girl...he murdered her with a knife up her rectum according to reports. How evil can a person get?
A million tax dollars to warehouse this MoFo.
Even for the 9th Circuit, preserving this evil predator is low.
one lump or three.. duhhhh.
just strap a big chicken round his neck and toss him in the pool at sea world with the orcas
thirty years ago a 15 year old was raped murdered brutalized .. now the court is dickering with what to use to whack the perp. where’s a roy bean when ya need him?
What? But I thought liberal judges were all about being "pro-choice!"
}:-)4
with judges like this, there is no such thing as swift justice. the system is broken. the victims be damned .. the convicted and appealed umpteen times have the courts on their side..
these need to be elected Jdges, not appointed and allowed to become demagogues unto themselves, the public deserves far better.. how many judges don’t make six figures, btw?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.