Skip to comments.
Open Carry Debate Could Affect Businesses
Culver's Decides Not To Create New Policy
channel3000.com ^
| 21 September, 2010
| NA
Posted on 09/26/2010 5:24:25 PM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
It is a smart business move not to ban open carry. Simply following the laws is least likely to alienate customers.
1
posted on
09/26/2010 5:24:28 PM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
“Guns could be in many other places. But in a restaurant? I don’t know. What’s the use for it?” said Jonuzi.
Google “lubys massacre” to find out ‘the use for it’ is.
2
posted on
09/26/2010 5:30:17 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: chaosagent
3
posted on
09/26/2010 5:34:27 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: marktwain
>>>>Some businesses said guns can scare some people, especially if they’re not aware of open carry laws.
This is where the pro-gun groups print up a flier that succinctly explains Wisconsin’s Open Carry laws, and provides copies of it for distribution to the Wisconsin Restaurant Association to pass out to its membership.
4
posted on
09/26/2010 5:36:24 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
To: marktwain; chaosagent
I love it. Saul Alinsky would approve.
You don’t further the 2nd Amendment by being quiet little church mice.
You get lawyered up and go for broke, being ever so careful to stay within the letter of the law.
Then, when business owners and cops put their feet in it, you hoist them on their own petard and make a big, fat, stinking issue. File a suit and start calling the media.
You can call it being obnoxious, you can also call it being pro-active.
5
posted on
09/26/2010 5:37:07 PM PDT
by
sinanju
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: marktwain
If I owned the business I would have asked them to leave.
It may be legal but it is not good for business. Allowing your children to scream and run around the restaurant may be legal, but in the same way it would be bad for business.
7
posted on
09/26/2010 5:40:35 PM PDT
by
earlJam
To: earlJam; All
“If I owned the business I would have asked them to leave.”
Business owners around the country disagree. Not only to open carriers bring in revenue, they provide a higer level of security.
8
posted on
09/26/2010 5:44:27 PM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
I cannot help but wonder why some want that gun on their hip....smarter for those with guns to have them concealed. then the bad guys don't know who to go after...I'd rather have a gun in my purse or shoulder holster than in plain site....I think those that fight for guns in plain site do a disservice to us....they will push until there is a backlash against all carry laws....but that is just mho..
To: marktwain
Sorry, “higer” should be “higher”.
To: marktwain
Business owners around the country disagree. Madison isn't around the country.
11
posted on
09/26/2010 5:46:09 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: marktwain
"Guns could be in many other places. But in a restaurant? I don't know. What's the use for it?" said Jonuzi.
Luby's cafeteria massacre
12
posted on
09/26/2010 5:48:03 PM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: chaosagent
Google McDonalds Massacre in San Ysidro Ca. 21 killed.
To: goat granny
“I cannot help but wonder why some want that gun on their hip....smarter for those with guns to have them concealed. then the bad guys don't know who to go after...I'd rather have a gun in my purse or shoulder holster than in plain site....I think those that fight for guns in plain site do a disservice to us....they will push until there is a backlash against all carry laws....but that is just mho..”
It appears to be exactly the opposite of what you fear. Wearing a gun in plain sight is direct deterrence of crime. Few criminals want to risk an armed encounter.
While there has been some push-back from the far left, what we see is a normalization of gun carrying by citizens who do not wear a uniform. Most people simply do not care. Felons do not carry openly. Felons do not use holsters.
The left has worked for 100 years to delegitimize the carrying of guns by people who do not wear uniforms. It will take a little bit to re-legitimize it, but it is happening much faster than I ever thought it would.
To: marktwain
Business owners around the country disagree. Not only to open carriers bring in revenue, they provide a higer level of security I don't believe you.
15
posted on
09/26/2010 5:54:37 PM PDT
by
earlJam
To: marktwain
Culver's Corp. was considering the need for a policy addressing the issue after a concerned customer called police.Doesn't pass the smell test. How could the "concerned customer" know the guys weren't cops undercover? Oh, I get it. The undercover cop enjoying the sundae at the counter was the concerned customer.
To: goat granny
I agree when I wear it on the hip it is a political statement. When I wear it concealed it is for safety. Why let the bad guys make you target #1 or #2? Surprise is part of a winning battle.
17
posted on
09/26/2010 5:54:55 PM PDT
by
jafojeffsurf
( Return to the Constitution.)
To: marktwain
Open carry is actually legal (with a permit) in MA.
Try doing it though. The cops will be all over you faster than the speed of light. You might not get cuffed, but there will be a record of the incident, and that WILL keep you from getting your CCW permit renewed.
18
posted on
09/26/2010 5:56:38 PM PDT
by
GOPsterinMA
(Support and vote for Sean Bielat (MA-4)! MA-4 is Barney Frank's district.)
To: All
"...Guns could be in many other places. But in a restaurant? I dont know. Whats the use for it? said Jonuzi..."

Hm. Well, I don't know...
19
posted on
09/26/2010 5:58:00 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Puritianism is the fear someone is having fun. Liberalism is the fear someone is making money...)
To: goat granny
dont forget, Wis has NO CCW [Ill is the only other] so they have no choice but to Open carry...
tactically, there are pros & cons to either carry mode, in this case im definatly pro choice...
20
posted on
09/26/2010 6:02:58 PM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson