Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fpimentel

Censorship and issues of National Security are not the same thing. Naturally, NYT chooses to ignore the reality of difference.


2 posted on 09/26/2010 9:55:30 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric

The army approved the book, 100 copies were distributed. From what I have been able to glean from my internet search, this is more about keeping Clinton and the democrats from getting embarrased by their backwards policy towards Al-Qaeda and Mohamed Atta pre 911. National Security is what failed us on September 11th 2001.


3 posted on 09/26/2010 10:09:43 AM PDT by Fpimentel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

Was this about National Security?

The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals. But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. Several Archives officials acknowledged that Berger could have stolen any number of items and they “would never know what, if any, original documents were missing.”


4 posted on 09/26/2010 10:13:31 AM PDT by Fpimentel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson