>Because, I want to know the FACTS if I can get them.
There are enough facts to 1) condemn the officers, and 2) warrant investigation into cover-up/conspiracy/tampering-with-evidence.
Consider these facts:
1 - initially, multiple witness statements directly contradicted the police version of events at about a rate of 77%. (40/52 = .7692...)
2 - initial reports had the crowd of witnesses confused as to why they were being evacuated... countering the Costco claim of ‘violent irrationality.’
3 - initial reports had multiple officers issuing conflicting commands; later [police] reports have one officer issuing conflicting commands...
—... this in itself is proof of either a lethal Command & Control failure/incompetence OR conspiracy/obstruction-of-justice (at the very least falsification of official records, and possibly perjury).
4 - the inquest testimonies have the police setting up prior to the evacuation approximately 30 min and yet the claim is they were not prepared?
5 - the “un-usability” of the video footage for the store coupled with the non-release of the initial 911 call[s?] coupled with the initial eyewitness accounts differing from the police accounts to such a high degree.
the real issue is gonna be whether or not those other witnesses will still be ready to testify after several more months of coersion...