Wrong.
Stories don't "have legs".
"Mediots, presstitutes, and propagandists" use the propaganda phrase "this story has legs" to cover the fact that they are pursuing some stories, and not others, in order to further their marxist agenda.
Don't let them fool you.
Don't be their "useful idiot".
That assertion requires Rogain. Would you rather I be a useless idiot? If they have such G-dlike power to select some stories and bury others, what ever happened to COFFEE parties, and why can’t they supress TEA parties? Why wasn’t Rush’s Oxy problem the end of his career? Why didn’t Jimmy Carter win a second term? Why did both Reagan and Dubya? It’s a real phenomenon, legs. The MSM is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. What we need is media knegged (against, in couterbalance to) media, and that can and has been done, and they can’t stop it. As time passes, they become less and less effective at policing the national and international agenda, and we’re a part of that. Stop feeling sorry for yourself. Don’t even start feeling sorry for them. They’re on the way out. But even so, you have to recognize and respect the phenomenon of “legs,” just as deep sea fishermen must respect weather and current.
“Wrong. Mediots, presstitutes and propagandists only repeat stories that have legs
Wrong.
Stories don’t “have legs”.
“Mediots, presstitutes, and propagandists” use the propaganda phrase “this story has legs” to cover the fact that they are pursuing some stories, and not others, in order to further their marxist agenda.
Don’t let them fool you.
Don’t be their “useful idiot”.”