Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

According to another article, the police are now vacating the citations, and charging all five open carriers with disturbing the peace.
1 posted on 09/23/2010 5:24:37 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

what’s the big deal about handing a police officer your driver’s license?


2 posted on 09/23/2010 5:29:07 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
It seems like Winrich is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why else would you carry a tape recorder with you?
3 posted on 09/23/2010 5:29:26 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

On WHAT basis? (disturbing the peace) No peace was disturbed until the officers intervened in a previously peaceful setting.

The article states these gentlemen offered no physical resistance or back talk, just not the forthcoming cooperation the officers sought.

This’ll be interesting to follow.

If you are close to this, please keep us FReepers informed.

Thanks for posting this update.


4 posted on 09/23/2010 5:29:28 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

It’s perfectly legal for the officer to ask you for ID in the situation though, and you have to comply. You cannot refuse to ID yourself to a uniformed LEO as far as I know.


5 posted on 09/23/2010 5:29:45 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Why didn’t the 911 operator simply inform the caller that open carry is legal?


6 posted on 09/23/2010 5:29:49 AM PDT by G Larry (Patty-cake diplomacy must give way to strong, decisive action!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Police check people to see if they can legally drive or are impaired, regularly. Open carry really isn’t anything like carrying a carrot or a cell phone.


11 posted on 09/23/2010 5:34:49 AM PDT by stuartcr (Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

We’re now forcing our LEOs to be crime “predictors?!” They have to roll up on a peaceful situation and assess the possibility that the perps might commit a crime? This is ridiculous!


16 posted on 09/23/2010 5:38:47 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Ah Uber-Liberal Madison. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy (except for Ann Arbor MI)

We must be cautious.


22 posted on 09/23/2010 5:40:14 AM PDT by Portnoy (Follow me on Twitter @thehipposass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
"But Winrich, who made an audio recording of the encounter with Madison police, said he carries a recorder in case a problem arises. He said he chose not to give his ID to Madison police because of "the attitude and the overstepping of authority that they had.""

This could land the man with a felony charge. Many states are making recording of a cop in the line of duty a crime, whether done on purpose or inadvertently (a guy with a helmet cam who forgot it was rolling recently got jail time). They claim it impededs their ability to interview witnesses who normally don't want to get involved (i.e. illegals and drug users). First and second amendments be damned.

26 posted on 09/23/2010 5:45:08 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
But Auric Gold, secretary of Wisconsin Carry

Somebody's dad was a James Bond fan.

68 posted on 09/23/2010 6:34:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Wisconsin's stop and identify law:
968.24 Temporary questioning without arrest. After having identified himself or herself as a law enforcement officer, a law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place for a reasonable period of time when the officer reasonably suspects that such person is committing, is about to commit or has committed a crime, and may demand the name and address of the person and an explanation of the person's conduct. Such detention and temporary questioning shall be conducted in the vicinity where the person was stopped.
Such laws have being upheld by the Supreme Court seems to always hinge on the reasonable suspicion of a crime past, present or future, according to Terry. So they have to show that a bunch of guys sitting around openly carrying constituted a reasonable suspicion -- for an officer educated about the law of course, not an ignorant old lady.
91 posted on 09/23/2010 6:59:10 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
But Auric Gold, secretary of Wisconsin Carry, and Mike Stollenwerk, cofounder of OpenCarry.org, said police do not have the right to demand that people identify themselves without probable cause to believe they've committed or are about to commit a crime.

This is a joke right? ...wasn't the Ian Flemming character Auric Goldfinger?

.

136 posted on 09/23/2010 7:39:00 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Here's a press release from the City of Madison, regarding the Open Carry incident.

Facebook site to support the Open Carry guys.

181 posted on 09/23/2010 8:15:09 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
More info at the Wisconsin Carry site.
267 posted on 09/23/2010 12:04:20 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson