Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was politics behind the govt's decision to preserve the UAW's pensions? (is the Pope Catholic?)
The Washington Post ^ | Sepember 18, 2010 | Staff

Posted on 09/22/2010 7:11:58 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

IT IS ONE of the enduring puzzles surrounding the bailout of General Motors: Why did retired salaried personnel of a former GM division, Delphi, receive a fraction of their promised pension benefits, while Delphi's retired hourly personnel, members of the United Auto Workers, got 100 percent, paid for in part by the "new" taxpayer-supported GM? For months, this has been a simmering cause celebre on the right, with critics accusing the Obama administration of paying off its union backers -- and echoing white-collar retirees' demand for the same deal the UAW got. Now, at the insistence of Republicans in Congress, Neil M. Barofsky, the special inspector general for taxpayer bailout funds, has pledged to investigate "whether political considerations played a role in favoring hourly over salaried retirees."

The story of GM's relationship with Delphi, which made powertrain, safety and other technologies, is a convoluted one. In short, GM spun off the company in 1999, and it later went bankrupt. As is usual in such situations, the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) eventually took over Delphi's underfunded pension funds, paying its beneficiaries pennies on the dollar. But the UAW, unlike the salaried employees, had negotiated a prior agreement under which GM agreed to "top off" members' pensions if an independent Delphi ever went bust. Honoring this commitment added $2.1 billion to the GM pension plan's deficit in the fall of 2008, a time when GM, too, was rapidly going down the tubes.

The Obama administration's auto task force decided taxpayers couldn't afford to give Delphi's white-collar workers any more than the reduced benefits to which they were legally entitled.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; generalmotors; obama; unions

1 posted on 09/22/2010 7:12:00 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Idiot-ridden Washington Post needs Captain Obvious to put up foot up their collective arses..... =.=


2 posted on 09/22/2010 7:14:54 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The Delphi peeps that voted for the commie usurper obama should not get made whole, only the ones that did not vote for Dunham. If Dunham can select which car dealers to put out of business, a judge can select which Delphi dummies not to reimburse.


3 posted on 09/22/2010 7:15:04 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

ping


4 posted on 09/22/2010 7:15:36 AM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Saw on a crawl at the bottom of the screen on CNBC this morning that GM is once again giving money to political campaigns. Inquiring minds want to know who is getting taxpayer money, laundered through Government Motors.


5 posted on 09/22/2010 7:23:00 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Anyone see the interview with the United States Postal Service guy last night on “Moneytalks” - FOXNews Business channel? When asked about the $7-8 billion in the hole for the last few years, his response was that their pension are at least paid and in good shape.....reminded me of these union GM, etc. arseholes...... =.=


6 posted on 09/22/2010 7:35:29 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

If this decision was not political, one wonders what kind of evidence someone might need to be convinced that it was.

It’s sort of like the Philadelphia voter intimidation case. If THAT wasn’t voter intimidation, then the very notion of voter intimidation has lost all meaning.


7 posted on 09/22/2010 7:53:15 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

you’ll find out when you see all of the union thugs hanging around your polling place on election day


8 posted on 09/22/2010 8:14:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Obama unions gift to America.


9 posted on 09/22/2010 9:16:30 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson