Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear Waste Site
Fox News ^ | 19 Sept 2010 | Fox News

Posted on 09/19/2010 3:56:53 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
This is an important issue and Reid/Obama need to be called out on it, but does this risk making Reid look better in the eyes of the Nevada electorate?
1 posted on 09/19/2010 3:57:00 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

How does this make Reid look better?


2 posted on 09/19/2010 3:59:24 PM PDT by PoplarBluffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Sorry, I botched the title. Please fix or remove. Thanks.


3 posted on 09/19/2010 3:59:45 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Nevada was happy enough to take all the money to build the thing.


4 posted on 09/19/2010 4:01:29 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoplarBluffian

In the eyes of Nevada residents he is protecting their state from becoming the nuclear dumping ground for the whole country. Blocking the Yucca Mountain project is very popular in Nevada. In South Carolina, not so much.


5 posted on 09/19/2010 4:02:05 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Nevada was happy enough to take all the money to build the thing.

Yes, for the most part they were, but that was last week. Now that we're ready to start hauling in nuclear waste it doesn't seem like such a great idea to them.

6 posted on 09/19/2010 4:04:55 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox
" If the feds want to renege on the promise to keep Yucca open, they must refund the $1.2 billion our state has spent on the facility."

The money (like all vote-buying handout money) is already spent, and non-refundable. Sorta like the Katrina dollars, the Louisiana Purchase from Landrieu, the Ted Kennedy Big Dig, etc., etc.

7 posted on 09/19/2010 4:16:20 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Get medieval on the Demon-rats.


8 posted on 09/19/2010 4:17:32 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Storing nuclear waste anywhere on land doesn’t seem like a good idea — period!

The nuclear waste should first be sealed in concrete and steel casks then lowered into the Aleutian deep ocean trench at a spot nearly a mile deep.

There it can be recycled into the earth’s crust at a subduction zone where it will literally be crushed to about one molecule thick as it pulled into the earth from which it originated.


9 posted on 09/19/2010 4:17:52 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Yes, but on the other hand, it does show how wishy- washy & wasteful the federal government is.


10 posted on 09/19/2010 4:18:08 PM PDT by PoplarBluffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Or, better yet, use it again in a fast breeder reactor.


11 posted on 09/19/2010 4:32:40 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
..it can be recycled into the earth’s crust at a subduction zone...

That's an excellent idea. Has anyone ever done an in-depth study on how it might actually be done?

Would it be sufficient to just drop the casks into the trench or would you have to drill into the pacific side of the trench and insert the casks at some depth to ensure they go the right way?

12 posted on 09/19/2010 4:46:54 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Or we could reprocess it as do other countries and use it to refuel our own reactors, oh wait, we can’t, Jimmah and all


13 posted on 09/19/2010 5:07:17 PM PDT by VTenigma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox; All

Interesting/educational post/thread. Thanks to all posters. BTTT!


14 posted on 09/19/2010 5:20:37 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox
"In the eyes of Nevada residents he is protecting their state from becoming the nuclear dumping ground for the whole country. Blocking the Yucca Mountain project is very popular in Nevada. In South Carolina, not so much."

Any Nevadan who believes that should take a remedial course in logical thinking. First, Yucca Mountain is not a "dump", it is a highly controlled, tightly designed repository. Second, IT'S TOO LATE.....Nevadans should have thought of this before they let the gov't detonate several dozen nuclear weapons underground at Yucca FLATS (which is within "spittin' distance" of Yucca MOUNTAIN). And yes, Virginia, both sites are named "Yucca" for a reason. They're pretty much both in the same damned place.

15 posted on 09/19/2010 5:51:28 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Humm, then maybe you should be for the Yucca Mountain site it would be save and secure a mile or two below the surface. The people of NV are mainly against it because Democrat politicians have been demagoguing it for 30 years in hopes of killing Nuclear Power. They are scum IMHO.
16 posted on 09/19/2010 5:54:49 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
"The nuclear waste should first be sealed in concrete and steel casks then lowered into the Aleutian deep ocean trench at a spot nearly a mile deep. There it can be recycled into the earth’s crust at a subduction zone where it will literally be crushed to about one molecule thick as it pulled into the earth from which it originated."

Not necessarily a good idea. At least not before the fuel has been processed to recover the remaining fissionable content (mostly Plutonium, but a few others), and valuable radioisotopes useful in technology applications. Yucca would be great as "monitored retrievable storage" until we are sure there aren't a lot of valuable goodies in that fuel.

THEN do the "subduction zone" thing.

17 posted on 09/19/2010 5:54:53 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

This site has been in the works supposedly for over thirty years; the gubmint has repeatedly balked at building a processing facility to reduce the size of the waste to make it easier to store; most of the slowly-accumulating waste generated by nuke plants is stored at or near the nuke plant itself, no doubt in terrorist-proof facilities of some kind.

Thanks SC Swamp Fox.

Sleep tight all.


18 posted on 09/19/2010 6:30:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

It’s a good place to store the stuff. I worked there in ‘97. They talk about ground water, but it’s a dry tunnel, not like the ones in Area 12 on the weapons side under Ranier Mesa.


19 posted on 09/19/2010 6:50:02 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

There were over 900 tests at NTS (Yucca Flats included). The NTS is pretty big. It takes about an hour to drive to either the weapons areas or Yucca Mtn from the gate at Mercury.


20 posted on 09/19/2010 6:52:19 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson