All I have done is give you a simple recitation of the facts.
Unlike Rove, I have give the sources for the facts on Rove contact with Castle's camp.
Rove, on the other hand, is allowed to go out and make accusations, with no factual back up and we are simply to accept his accusations as "facts"?
Why does Rove get a free ride to spread his slanderous attacks on O'Donnell? Then when the documented evidence is presented by O'Donnell why is Rove allowed to simply ignore it to continue his slanderous statements?
Why is Rove to be held immune from any consequence for his actions?
Why is Rove allowed to go on national TV day after day, with no questions asked of him, demanding a standard of conduct from his political foe, that he himself has not live up to?
Can we also discuss Mort Kondracke referring to Sharron Angle (AZ-Winner) as a “nut” & “wacko” on Bret’s panel this evening?
Johnnie, I’m merely asking you to consider this whole pseudo-controversy from a MACRO level — the level that I identified in my previous comment.
[FYI: I don’t know or care about O’Donnell — and neither do most people on this forum. She is simply a proxy for those who are fighting ‘other’ battles.]