Had you read the entire post you would have found the logic you cannot follow so look at yourself first.
I wrote: You have a right to buy or not buy health care, well you did until we allowed Washington to once again violate the Constitution.
I also wrote they you do not have the right to have someone pay for your insurance.
People constantly use the ignorant phrase, "well I read the constitution and I don't see a RIGHT for xyz"
What on Gods green earth makes anyone other than a brain dead liberal think the founders could have enumerated every fricken right?
Good grief civics 101
I did read your entire post.
I wrote: You have a right to buy or not buy health care, well you did until we allowed Washington to once again violate the Constitution.
You had responded to the original statement that healthcare is not a right, stating that it in fact was a right. This is where I disagree with you. Yes, a person, if insurable, has the choice to buy (if financially able) or not buy insurance coverage. That does not make healthcare a right.
I also wrote they you do not have the right to have someone pay for your insurance.
If you're referring to taxpayers paying for it, I wasn't talking about that. When I say people don't have a right to not pay their medical bills, I'm referring to people without coverage who think that they have a right to be insured, therefore not having to pay 100% of their costs. My prime example is a person coming down with terminal brain cancer, then wanting to all of a sudden get covered so they aren't hit with the full brunt of the medical costs.
But, I agree that there is no right to have taxpayes pay for your medical costs.