“Costco will give our attorney, Ross Goodman, an unaltered copy of the appropriate Summerlin-store surveillance-video recorded on July 10th. We know another copy exists, archived offsite, per Costco’s insurance requirements. And METRO’s Sheriff Gillespie will release the 911-call audio tape, at least to Ross Goodman, if not to the Las Vegas media.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2579595/posts
I could see that, now come to think of it. That they would have big bandwidth. I forgot how constant the data is these big chains, that when you leave the store, the purchases are immediately sent to just in time suppliers. So, maybe they do have the bandwidth.
Questions though. Is it the same, or is the refresh, buffering rate, ie quality, reduced? This is common for bandwidth problems where the high quality remains on site, and a choppier, lower quality is sent out.
I find the notion of any copy/retrieval error suspicious. Professional systems are not handled by the new bag boy. Costco would have their own tech’s, the physical system and software would be the same store-to-store. Retrieving for employee theft, shop lifting, slip and falls would be uber routine task.
That’s what they said. After claiming it wasn’t gotten on tape, the cameras were off. The tapes were damaged. They had to be sent to Calif to be “restored”. Yeah. I’m buying that. Not.
Sure they will release it... A half hour after the Sun burns out.
So... why did the LVPD Captain say there was no camera footage? Then say that there was, but it was damaged?
Why did they send it to LA ? Unaltered.... sure.
In legal terms, the police and COSTCO had motive, and time, and sent the ‘item’ to a place known for having the best editing equipment in the US.
The COPS need to bring the COPS and COSTCO in for questioning. (That will happen the day Obama says, “I lied. I’m not a Christian, and I’m a Communist puppet”.)