[freedomwarrior998]

Sarah’s pick was the right one.....Nathan Deal is a terrible candidate to run against Barnes who is a very skilled politician. Barnes would have had a much harder time going negative on a fresh faced female candidate. This is the year of the “momma grizzlies” and Handle would have fit right in with the trend. Deal comes across as an old, crotchitty candidate that the affable Barnes will destroy....especially with this news coming out. I hate Barnes but he’s good. Karen Handle would have beat him...I don’t think Deal will.

So Sarah's pick in Georgia was right because Handel was more electable? Since when did we care about the more electable candidate? Handel was wobbly on pro-life issues and was paling around with the Log Cabin homos (instant no-go in my book).

Deal is the more Conservative.

[bwc2221]

“Deal is the more Conservative.”

That will mean a lot if he is indicted.

[Oshkalaboomboom]

So Sarah's pick in Georgia was right because Handel was more electable?

Maybe someone has her confused with Mike Castle

Deal is the more Conservative.

That's why I voted for him and will continue to support him.