Communication is a two way street -so, I will take at least half the blame...
I would agree with your point in general that principles must have a firm foundation; otherwise, they are like leaves blowing in the wind -when wind direction changes so do principles without foundation. The principle(s) Cornyn advocates here seem be blowing in the wind.
Maybe, if Cornyn would specifically state what exactly he disagrees with "them" about and how exactly he hopes to accomplish gaining conservative votes from supposed conservatives that would supposedly vote conservative anyway then what is left unsaid would become clear?
An obvious question is -if this just a conservative initiative and is not about advancing the homosexual agenda then why is it all about meeting a group that promotes the homosexual agenda?
>>Maybe, if Cornyn would specifically state what exactly he disagrees with “them” about<<
That’s the key!!!! From what I have seen of Cornyn I’m doubtful that he has the moral foundation needed. While I don’t think that he is going there to advance the homosexual agenda neither can I say he isn’t but I doubt it.
Given the revelations lately of the pervasiveness of the homosexual lifestyle in Washington allegedly going all the way to the top I wonder any more.
Oh, have you seen this one. It’s the slippery slope I’m afraid.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2590644/posts?page=1