Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rethinking George Bush?
Townhall.com ^ | September 16, 2010 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 09/16/2010 5:06:44 AM PDT by Kaslin

Former President George W. Bush left office with the lowest approval ratings since Richard Nixon. In reaction, for nearly two years President Barack Obama won easy applause by prefacing almost every speech on his economic policies with a "Bush did it" put-down.

But suddenly Bush seems OK. Last week, the president did the unthinkable: He praised Bush for his past efforts to reach out to Muslims. Vice President Joe Biden went further and blurted out, "Mr. Bush deserves a lot of credit." Biden topped that off with, "Mr. President, thank you."

Even liberal pundits have now called on Bush to help Obama diffuse rising tensions over the so-called Ground Zero mosque and Arizona's illegal immigration law.

What's going on?

For one thing, recent polls show an astounding rebound in the former president's favorability -- to the extent that in the bellwether state of Ohio, voters would rather still have Bush as president than Obama by a 50-42 margin. Nationwide, Obama's approval ratings continue to sink to near 40 percent -- a nadir that took years for Bush to reach. It has become better politics to praise rather than to bury Bush.

Iraq seems on the road to success, with a growing economy and a stabilizing government. Don't take my word on that; ask Vice President Biden. He recently claimed that the way Iraq is going, it could become one of the Obama administration's "greatest achievements." Obama himself seconded that when the former war critic called the American effort in Iraq "a remarkable chapter" in the history of the two countries.

Then there are the growing comparisons with Bush's supposed past transgressions. Compared to Obama, they're starting to look like traffic tickets now. Take the economy and the war on terror. Americans were angry at the Bush-era deficits. But they look small after Obama trumped them in less than two years.

For six years of the Bush administration, Americans enjoyed a strong economy. So far, there hasn't been a similar month under Obama. Bush had a one-time Wall Street meltdown, but Obama's permanent big-government medicine for it seems far worse than the original disease.

If Hurricane Katrina showed government ineptness, so did the recent BP oil spill. Maybe such problems in the Gulf were neither Bush nor Obama's fault alone, but are better attributed to the inept federal bureaucracy itself -- or to freak weather and human laxity.

On the war on terror, Obama has dropped all the old campaign venom. Bush's Guantanamo Bay detention facility, renditions, tribunals, intercepts, wiretaps, predator drone attacks, and policies in Afghanistan and Iraq are no longer dubbed a shredding of the Constitution. All are now seen as national security tools that must be kept, if not expanded, under Obama.

In comparison to Obama and his gaffes, Bush no longer seems the singular clod whom his opponents endlessly ridiculed. The supposedly mellifluent Obama relies on the teleprompter as if it were his umbilical cord. His occasional word mangling (he pronounced "corpsman" as "corpse-man") and weird outbursts (he recently complained that opponents "talk about me like a dog") remind us that the pressures of the presidency can make a leader sometimes seem silly.

Bush now seems cool because he has played it cool. The more Obama and Biden have trashed him, the more silent and thus magnanimous he appears. Bush's post-presidency is not like that of Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton -- both have criticized their successors and hit the campaign trail -- but similar to that of his father, who worked with, rather than harped about, Bill Clinton. That graciousness not only has helped George W. Bush in the polls, but it finally seems to be mellowing out Obama as well.

Criticism of Bush got out of hand the last few years of his term. Writing novels or making documentaries about killing the president, or libeling him as a Nazi, is not the sort of politics that we want continued during the Obama years. So it makes sense before the general election to halt the endless blame-gaming, before what goes around comes around.

The frenzy of Bush hatred and Obama worship that crested in the summer of 2008 is over. We now better remember the Bush at Ground Zero with a megaphone and his arm around a fireman than the Texan who pronounced "nuclear" as "nucular." Meanwhile, hope-and-change now seems to offer little hope and less change.

America woke up from its 2008 trance and is concluding that Bush was never as bad, and Obama never as good, as advertised.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: bush; georgebush; georgewbush; katrina; rino; vdh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: ZULU; pissant
RE :”I totally agree with you on ALL POINTS.

Thanks, a Bush liberal on this thread just called me a “friggin idiot”. I must admit that is pretty tame compared to some Bush-bot responses I have got the past two years.

81 posted on 09/16/2010 7:50:54 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
Yeah but did he take his shoes of like 0bama did?

And unlike the arrogant pos who currently resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, George W. Bush was a President for all Americans not certain selected few selected ones like 0bama is

82 posted on 09/16/2010 8:00:40 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; All

So, what was he suppose to do?? Protect Jobs?? A job is not a right nor guaranteed.. Unless you work for the Government..


83 posted on 09/16/2010 8:06:17 AM PDT by KevinDavis (President Obama: The Crybaby in Chief...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GBA; Cracker Jack
If you plot the periods of Democrat and Republican control of Congress against historical unemployment and stock market charts you will see some very interesting correlations.

In January 1995, the Republicans took control of the House and Senate. Unemployment was at approximately 6.25%. The Dow Jones Industrial Index was at approximately 3,800.

The Republicans controlled both houses of Congress until the end of 2000. During the period from January 1995 to December 2000, unemployment dropped from 6.25% to approximately 3.75%. During the same period, the Dow rose from 3,800 to over 10,600.

From January 2001 until the end of 2002, the Democrats either controlled the Senate or it was split 50/50 between the parties. During this period, unemployment climbed from 3.75% to approximately 6.5%. During the same period, the Dow dropped from 10,600 to 8,300.

From January 2003 until the end of 2006, the Republicans again controlled both houses of Congress. During this period, unemployment dropped from 6.5% to just over 4%. During the same period, the Dow rose from 8,300 to 12,300.

In November 2006, the Democrats took control of both houses of Congress. In the same month, unemployment was at 4.3% and the DOW was over 12,500. Since then, the Democrats have continuously held control of Congress. Unemployment has continuously climbed and the Dow plummeted.

Imagine what the MSM would say if there were such a perfect correlation between CO2 and global temperatures?

Republicans need to constantly remind voters that this year is a Congressional election not a Presidential election. The Democrats have controlled Congress since 2006. By every objective measure, the economy is far worse off now that it was when the Democrats took control.

The Democrats own this recession. If everything that has happened since 2006 is George Bush's fault, then what the hell have the Democrats been doing in Congress for the past four years and why should we allow them to continue doing it?

84 posted on 09/16/2010 8:31:59 AM PDT by kennedy (I am a Kennedy. Where do I go to claim my Senate seat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No problem-I tend to speed read, too. :)


85 posted on 09/16/2010 8:34:02 AM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I think the best way to deal with Bushbots is to simply ignore them.

We have to remember that Bush, despite his many flaws, was a patriot who loved America. Its really not his fault his judgement was so defective. It was mistake to nominate any Bush in the first place, but in 2000 our options were limited. He tried his best but wasn’t up to it.

Lets hope the lesson was learned and “Jeb” doesn’t run for higher office.

I think the Bushes are history, unlike the Kennedys, another Klan which keeps on giving no matter how many of them eliminate themselves through their own stupidity, or the Clintons, who are like something that gets stuck on the bottom of your shoe if you’re carelss in dog or horse country. The Kennedys are such a serious problem because they are so prolific and so leftist. Even rodents couldn’t outbreed them.


86 posted on 09/16/2010 8:41:58 AM PDT by ZULU (No nation which tried to tolerate Islam escaped Islamization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I voted for Bush because I believed he was a decent man with
American values and a solid religious belief system.


87 posted on 09/16/2010 8:45:28 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

I voted for Bush because he wasn’t a Democrat and somehow they managed to get him to stop smirking.


88 posted on 09/16/2010 8:46:50 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

Which he was and still is


89 posted on 09/16/2010 8:48:50 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
The Democrats own this recession. If everything that has happened since 2006 is George Bush's fault, then what the hell have the Democrats been doing in Congress for the past four years and why should we allow them to continue doing it?

That sounds like a campaign theme to me. Great questions!

90 posted on 09/16/2010 8:53:05 AM PDT by Cracker Jack (If it weren't for the democrats, republicans would be the worst thing in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
RE :”I think the Bushes are history...

I do my best to not bring him up or think about him except when these coolaid re-write history articles are posted. Heck, if we buy this crap then we should nominate someone like GWB 2012. Polls are showing voters are leaning Republican specifically because they think Republicans will have different policies than Bush did.

91 posted on 09/16/2010 9:00:23 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cracker Jack

Right on! Pelosi, Reid, 0b0z0 took over Congress in 2007 and started to destroy our economy to push their left wing wet dreams and to redistribute our incomes/savings to pay for their illegals and perpetual welfare scum, who voted them into power.

“During the six years Bush had a republican Congress, unemployment was near historic lows and the economy was strong. During the nearly two years Obama has had a democrat Congress, unemployment is high and the economy is sick.

There is some symmetry there, and people are starting to recognize it.”


92 posted on 09/16/2010 9:13:50 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Compassionate Conservatism, a New Tone in Washington, and Amnesty. Now his henchman, Karl Rove is all apoplectic that it’s all coming under attack by the American people.


93 posted on 09/16/2010 9:18:46 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Bush spent too much, but as a percentage of GDP his average deficit was lower than any other Republican President since Nixon.

Maybe that's because he took over a nearly balanced budget as your graphic indicates.

94 posted on 09/16/2010 9:20:39 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Or maybe it (and the balanced budget) was because he had a Republican Congress for three quarters of his term.


95 posted on 09/16/2010 9:24:17 AM PDT by csmusaret (The Obama/Pelosi/Reid Cartel has saddled each of my grandchildren with a $44,000 debt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; sickoflibs

Absolutely not


96 posted on 09/16/2010 9:31:47 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Servant of the Cross

RE :”Absolutely not”

How about Sarah Palin as president?


97 posted on 09/16/2010 9:40:05 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Or maybe it (and the balanced budget) was because he had a Republican Congress for three quarters of his term.

Didn't W have the same?

98 posted on 09/16/2010 9:52:31 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I’d take her over Carter, or his 1/2 black, 1/2 baked protege in a NY minute, if that’s what you’re asking.


99 posted on 09/16/2010 9:53:58 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; pissant

Speaking of Sarah Palin (nice try at changing the subject), you are my Exhibit 1 (similar to how pissant identifies what he considers Sarah ‘cultists’ here) as a poster who is nothing more than a knee-jerk, sycophant, cultist who has exposed themselves as an unthinking anti-BushBot. IMHO, you damage the credibility of the “purist conservative” contingent at FR, similar to the way that another poster (seohyoung something or other) harmed the case for those Sarah Palin supporters here. You’re no better and in fact are worse imho.


100 posted on 09/16/2010 9:57:15 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson