Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat

“In this case it is a strategic decision on where to use resources”

Baloney,, that doesn’t explain announcing it as she gave her victory speech. The only strategic decision they made was to harm her all they could.


242 posted on 09/14/2010 8:10:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

I completely agree with your comment on the announcement - in fact even if it is a decision they’ve made there is no reason to officially announce something like that ever publicly in a statement. I also meant to include the words “it could be a” after “in this case”...I actually thought for a second you had edited that out and then saw what I had posted. Anyway, I don’t know that for sure, and it is just as valid to assume it is being done out of spite - but it is not consistent with their pattern of coming around and supporting the primary voters’ choice in other races once those candidates won the primary. This is the first one, if this report is accurate, where they would have not done that so far.

But aside from that, you just lifted my remarks completely out of context and ignored what I was responding to overall. You are encouraging people to not give to conservative candidates supposedly to send the NRSC a message, even though that would directly harm the very candidates you claim it would help (the NRSC wouldn’t care about getting complaints from candidates they aren’t already supporting and those candidates would already know they didn’t get support from the NRSC without you not donating to them). This would only cement the position of the NRSC and further harm the candidates that would need support. Sending them a message would be for those candidates to get a huge warchest to the point they don’t need the NRSC - that would make the NRSC notice, not drying up the funds further of candidates they aren’t supporting to begin with. Moreover, why not just contribute to the Our Country Deserves Better PAC or the Senate Conservatives Fund?


284 posted on 09/14/2010 8:26:02 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

“In this case it is a strategic decision on where to use resources”?????

These so-called representatives of the people are scared of a fight! It isn’t a battle if it isn’t uphill and there’s no adversity! I’m sickened by the cowardice of those who’d rather go along, to get along. They certainly don’t represent the American Spirit!


301 posted on 09/14/2010 8:35:12 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson