I call that our tax money. I still say granting more permits would have had the same result, a reduction in deer population...the difference is legitimate hunters, not paid contractors, would have gotten to hunt. As far as the “Butler boys” I have no knowledge nor comment.
Did you pay into the fund? If you didn't, it is none of your business. You can call it a tax but it is a user fee. The money never enters the US Treasury. Hunters, who pay the excise tax/user fee don't object to it because they know it goes back into hunting.
There is also an excise tax on fishing equipment and supplies that is handled the same way.
Also on pleasure boat fuel that goes back into boat ramps, docks, wharves and jetties.
"I still say granting more permits would have the same result"
Do you have any education in wildlife management or range management? Any on the job experience?