Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray

The counter to AESA radar frying electronics has long been known, even before AESA radar existed, since the defection of a Soviet MiG-25 Foxbat pilot. It was discovered that his advanced aircraft didn’t have solid state electronics, but tubes, that were far more resistant to electromagnetic pulse.

While I’m not suggesting that drones should have tubes, the philosophy behind this was sound as an effective defensive measure. If nothing else, their electronics can be shielded, and they can fly blind for some seconds until the threat is over—something you can’t do in a high performance aircraft.

Likewise, turnabout is fair play. Since such aircraft are expendable, why not put a few in the armada that are designed to produce a powerful, directional electronic pulse towards a high performance aircraft? Instead of a 1000lb bomb, they carry a 500lb capacitor and a radar dish. And the best part is that even if they can’t use it against an aircraft, they can use it against ground targets.


26 posted on 09/15/2010 4:43:41 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Tubes mean the weight goes up. Propulsion and fuel weight goes up, price of drones goes up, relative payload goes down.


27 posted on 09/16/2010 10:02:35 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson