Sure it can, but it didn't here.
The Impeach the Bushers - just like so many here - didn't understand the parliamentary trick employed by the Republicans. Why do I say that? Because they were shocked that after calling Castle's office he didn't want to impeach Bush. They couldn't understand why he'd vote for the resolution, and not want to impeach Bush.
I suspect they were suffering from the same thing that many here seem to be suffering from - public schools.
"Castle can claim anything he wants, but he didn't vote to kill the bill and no day late doubletalk will change that."
Not according to Jim Gerhaty, who wrote an article about this very fact at the time of the vote.
I frequently find that people will use the phrase "double talk when they read something they - because of their own intellectual shortcomings - can't understand. Just saying.
Maybe he lied.
Just the 24 bright ones, right?
I frequently find that people will use the phrase "double talk when they read something they - because of their own intellectual shortcomings - can't understand. Just saying.
Gee, did Jim Gerhaty tell you that too? Again....A no vote on the motion to refer would have resulted in a final vote on the Articles of Impeachment, which would likely have failed (from the impeach Bush site). It didn't thanks to those tricky few republicans