Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw
We could easily have a policy of libertarian, free wheeling capitalism within our national borders but be protectionist and non-libertarian when it comes to commerce and trade with other nations.

We could, but we'd take a huge hit to our wealth and power as a result.

In fact that is how we used to be and tariffs were the main source of revenue for our young Federal Gov’t. Alcohol and tobacco taxes were also important.

We ought to go back to supporting the government solely with consumption taxes, but they should be structured so as not to discriminate against imports or types of goods (I like my microbrews and my single malts, thank you very much!).

52 posted on 09/13/2010 12:25:50 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody
We could, but we'd take a huge hit to our wealth and power as a result.

Running 400-700 billion dollar trade deficits are not how a nation becomes wealthy unless you think charging (on your credit card) all kinds of things you can't pay for is intelligent

63 posted on 09/13/2010 1:28:33 PM PDT by dennisw (-He who will not economize will have to agonize----- Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson