Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhombus

“Um...yeah... and John Brown broke into the arsenal at Harper’s Ferry to fight Walmart. Uh huh, yeah that’s it.

But yes, the industrial and manufacturing North generally supported free trade. ... “

I don’t present myself as an expert. But what I have read, and been taught, supports that the real tensions of the Civil War revolved around the North’s desire for the South’s cotton crop. The South wanted the better price that England was paying. The North needed cotton to fuel their textile mills, but couldn’t match England’s price.

So, apparently the North was pro free trade, until it was their ox that was being gored. (Not unlike most free traders).

As for slavery, there were abolishonists, and some of them were violent. But the North was ready to make a deal and would have “grandfathered” slave states, with no slavery in any new state.

That’s what I was taught.


28 posted on 09/13/2010 11:14:51 AM PDT by brownsfan (D - swift death of the republic, R - lingering death for the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: brownsfan

What you wrote makes sense but then it would seem that the protectionists won the war then - not the free traders.


33 posted on 09/13/2010 11:23:49 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson