Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress to be told of 60-billion US-Saudi arms deal (Obama's New Best Muslim Friends)
Yahoo/AFP ^ | 9/13/2010 | Unattributed

Posted on 09/13/2010 8:56:24 AM PDT by mojito

WASHINGTON (AFP) – In the largest US arms deal ever, the administration of US President Barack Obama is ready to notify Congress of plans to offer advanced aircraft to Saudi Arabia worth up to 60 billion dollars, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

The newspaper said the administration was also in talks with the kingdom about potential naval and missile-defense upgrades that could be worth tens of billions of dollars more.

[....]

In its notification to Congress, expected to be submitted this week or next, the administration will authorize the Saudis to buy as many as 84 new F-15 fighters, upgrade 70 more, and purchase three types of helicopters -- 70 Apaches, 72 Black Hawks and 36 Little Birds, The Journal noted, citing unnamed officials.

The notification will set off a congressional review.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armsdeal; islam; muslim; obama; obamanation; saudiarabia; taxdollars; wahabism
This is being peddled as an anti-Iranian measure.

Maybe.

It might also be construed as an anti-Israel measure.

We'll see if Israel is offered a similar package.

1 posted on 09/13/2010 8:56:26 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito

It is an anti-Iranian message and measure. The Saudis have already given Israel permission to use their air space if they need to.


2 posted on 09/13/2010 8:58:56 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Rep’s need to let the people know?


3 posted on 09/13/2010 8:59:19 AM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Rep’s need to let the people know?


4 posted on 09/13/2010 8:59:20 AM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

At least we’re exporting something to the world.

Hopefully every plane will have some kind of electronic “kill switch” that our guys can activate.


5 posted on 09/13/2010 9:00:09 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Didn’t he nullify an arms deal of some sort to Israel in the last year or so because of ongoing settlements on the west bank?


6 posted on 09/13/2010 9:00:19 AM PDT by NCDragon (If you can't stand behind the troops, try standing in front of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland
The Saudis have already given Israel permission to use their air space if they need to.

If so that would be ABOVE TOP SECRET. What's your source?

7 posted on 09/13/2010 9:03:14 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Anti Israel equals anti west, anti democracy.

My bet is anti Israel , anti Iran then the west. Not necessarily in that order.


8 posted on 09/13/2010 9:08:24 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Saudis are shareholders or MAJOR joint venture partners with 5 out of 6 American TV networks.

Wonder why TV talks about “moderate islam” all the time? In between “dumb white men” commericials.


9 posted on 09/13/2010 9:11:09 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

I don’t care how this is peddled - the Saudi’s support terrorism, even if our current and previous presidents won’t admit it. Their form of Wahhabism feeds the anti-Israel, anti-West sentiment that grows terrorism.

Such a deal, in my view, is an act of treason.

But who cares - the ONE approved this... so no-one will blink.


10 posted on 09/13/2010 9:14:58 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

I have read that “given Israel permission...” bit several times here on FR, but have yet to find any real source for that statement outside of some flakey pages...

I don’t trust ANY islamic regime - period. Particularly those that the President of the United States feels it necessary to bow down to...


11 posted on 09/13/2010 9:16:39 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The electronics will be manufactured in china, the included back door kill switch will be theirs.


12 posted on 09/13/2010 9:17:49 AM PDT by muddler (Diligentia, Vis and Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito
60 Billion, only 60 Billion? The US should sell them the same stuff for 600 Billion!
13 posted on 09/13/2010 9:19:18 AM PDT by 2001convSVT ("Repeal ObamaCare")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

As I understand it, Obama has cut off funding for F-15s for our own air force. But he wants to sell the Saudis a bunch of them, to use as they please?

Kind of like refusing to let Americans drill off our cost, but lending Brazil billions to drill off of their coast.

Maybe he can figure out a way to contract out building these F-15s to China. Then he’d really have a trifecta.


14 posted on 09/13/2010 9:20:26 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muddler

Sikorsky uses a Chinese sub-contractor? Intersting.

Might be a equity buying opporutnity. What is the name of Chinese sub-contractor?


15 posted on 09/13/2010 9:22:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; All

Related article:

SEPTEMBER 12, 2010

Saudi Arms Deal Advances

{snip}

The talks between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have been widely known for months, but many new details are only now coming into focus. These include the number and type of aircraft involved, how much the Saudis intend to spend in an initial installment, and the ongoing negotiations to also upgrade the kingdom’s navy and missile defenses.

The $60 billion in fighter jets and helicopters is the top-line amount requested by the Saudis, even though the kingdom is likely to commit initially to buying only about half that amount.

In a notification to Congress, expected to be submitted this week or next, the administration will authorize the Saudis to buy as many as 84 new F-15 fighters, upgrade 70 more, and purchase three types of helicopters—70 Apaches, 72 Black Hawks and 36 Little Birds, officials said.

{snip}

On top of the $60 billion package of fighter jets and helicopters, U.S. officials are discussing a potential $30 billion package to upgrade Saudi Arabia’s naval forces. An official described these as “discreet, bilateral conversations” in which no agreement has yet been reached. That deal could include littoral combat ships, surface vessels intended for operations close to shore, the official said.

Talks are also underway to expand Saudi Arabia’s ballistic-missile defenses. The U.S. is encouraging the Saudis to buy systems known as THAAD—Terminal High Altitude Defense—and to upgrade its Patriot missiles to reduce the threat from Iranian rockets. U.S. officials said it was unclear how much this package would be worth.

The U.S. has sought to build up missile defense across the region, and the Saudi package could be similar to one in the United Arab Emirates, officials said. THAAD is built by Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co. supplies the system’s radar. THAAD is the first system designed to defend against short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles both inside and outside the Earth’s atmosphere. It complements the lower-aimed Patriot missile defense system, providing a layered defense.

Lockheed officials have stated that they see serious export potential for the system in the Middle East, where a major concern exists about Iran’s ballistic missile development.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704621204575488361149625050.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs


16 posted on 09/13/2010 9:27:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Sikorsky uses a Chinese sub-contractor?

There probably isn't an American military aircraft, fixed or rotary wing, flying that doesn't have china made electronics to some degree or another.

There are a number of issues with quality control and because of the complexity unwanted and difficult to find "additions".

17 posted on 09/13/2010 9:39:05 AM PDT by muddler (Diligentia, Vis and Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

I heard it reported, too.

June 12, 2010
Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7148555.ece


18 posted on 09/13/2010 9:40:40 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012 (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Stratfor.com, very respected site.


19 posted on 09/13/2010 10:28:06 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

In South Carolina we have alligators, they can go for months between meals. An alligator that has just eaten his fill will lie in the sun and not move for hours, he is not hungry so why should he do anything unless he is threatened? These are known as “moderate” alligators. Kinda like “moderate” muslims. You can’t really trust either one.


20 posted on 09/13/2010 2:08:31 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson