You can link some scholarly argument wherein "this doesn't really mean named, it means called, and in that language this means that or it can mean that so REALLY blah blah blah," but it's no different than scholars jockeying around to prove global warming or nullify the 2nd amendment.
With people like you, the Old Testament could say BLUE and the new say RED but because you need to believe, you'll say "Well, blue and red are very near each other on the color wheel and in some parts of the country at that time, R and B were interchangable and the D was silent until a couple years later so REALLY.... blah blah blah.
He was a nut like David Koresh, his followers were the type David Koresh's usually pick up, and they were all from the same part of the world that gave us the Quran. Wise up. I'm going out.
Your continued use of inflammatory language convinces me that you have no interest in having a debate. Also, your lack of knowledge in this area appears to be extremely wide and deep.
You apparently think Yeshua’s mother spoke English or Spanish, calling him Jesus, rather than his Hebrew name.
You don’t seem to be aware that the book of Isaiah is a prophetic book. Instead, you seem to think it’s a history book or something. Good grief.
You seem to have no knowledge or understanding of Hebrew idioms, or Hebrew teaching of prophecy.
I therefore conclude it would be a waste of time to continue discussing this with you. You know very little, and from what you’ve posted, I suspect you read a book or maybe an online opinion piece, and are merely parroting what some other atheist claims about the Bible, rather than doing your own research.