Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2010 7:20:04 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Kaslin

Tyranny this way cometh.


2 posted on 09/12/2010 7:21:42 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Rather than honestly acknowledging the serious problems of Muslim culture, the Obama Administration has instead chosen to define American freedom as a problem.”

It is a problem when you don’t acknowledge individual rights and liberty. This is perfectly logical to the Communist mind.


3 posted on 09/12/2010 7:25:14 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
This could all be set right if it were acknowledged by the courts that any ideology, religious or not, loses any constitutional protections it may claim to enjoy if it advocates the violent overthrow of the government or poses a clear and present danger to national security.
4 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:38 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Describe the Pastor and his plans in whatever derogatory and demeaning terms you wish. Stupid. Inflammatory. Insensitive. Intolerant. Misguided. Ill-advised. My observation is that the man seems quite inarticulate, and a bit “nutty,” and I wish the Obama Administration and the worldwide media industry had not drawn so much attention to him (notice that I am not stating the man’s name – it makes no sense for me to give this character more attention).

I fine this quite condescending and unnecessary. Whether someone is adept at public speaking or not doesn't make some one nutty.

6 posted on 09/12/2010 7:29:20 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Why isn’t the City of NY using eminent domain to “confiscate” the property and set up a homeless shelter.


7 posted on 09/12/2010 7:30:05 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Yet this nutty guy is merely speaking his mind – and in America, we regard this as constitutionally protected “free speech.” For much of our nation’s history, Americans have possessed an attitude that says “I may disagree with what you say, but I’ll fight to the death for your right to say it..”But we now seem to have turned a corner on this type of freedom. In this instance, some of the most powerful people in our government determined that if this one private citizen were to exercise his legal right to burn copies of a particular book such an excursion in human liberty would threaten the security of Americans both domestically, and abroad – and thus,this one private citizen should not exercise his legal rights.

This is collectivism and the evil theory of "Greatest good" gone amok. By saying what's best for the collective is always what's more important, regardless of how small the decision, we have and will continue to lose freedom after freedom.

8 posted on 09/12/2010 7:30:22 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility ("In a time of universal deciet, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kaslin this is an EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!!!! THANK YOU for posting it!!!!!


10 posted on 09/12/2010 7:31:58 AM PDT by NordP (COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVES - Love of Country, Less Govt, Stop Spending, No Govt Run Health Care!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
We have a set of unintended consequences when radical Islam hides behind our Constitution and Bill of Rights and exploits a warped sense of social "tolerance".

If a movement uses our "rights" to practice a religion which calls for the destruction of the very country and seminal documents that protects their "rights", they will destroy us and implement Islam and Shari'a Law.

This is the perverted view that Islam is the "Religion of Peace" - a peace which will occur, in their minds, only when Islam is the sole accepted religion, and only when Shari'a Law is used on our shores...then there will be peace, under their definition.

When is enough enough?

11 posted on 09/12/2010 7:32:03 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Every liberty, every freedom comes at a cost. If the cost of our freedom of speech is an increased need to be vigilant and protect ourselves from those who don’t share, and deeply resent, that freedom then so be it. And that includes the President of the United States and any members of legislative or judicial body whose actions make them an enemy of out freedoms.


12 posted on 09/12/2010 7:32:35 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.
Thomas Jefferson

Only the insecure strive for security.
Wayne Dyer

The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.
John F. Kennedy

If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.
Henry Ford

The instant formal government is abolished, society begins to act. A general association takes place, and common interest produces common security.
Thomas Paine

And to this August list, we add...

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
Barack Obama

13 posted on 09/12/2010 7:33:14 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The response from multiple “leaders”, especially the “leader of the free world” (how do you lead what seems not to exist) is far “nuttier” than the pastor in Florida.


15 posted on 09/12/2010 7:37:38 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Of course we have free speech, citizen.

Here’s is your list of approved words and phrases. Feel free to say any of them.


16 posted on 09/12/2010 7:37:58 AM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
the fact that mere rhetoric can incite “death to America” demonstrations in Afghanistan and can rise to the level of a national security threat says something about the predominant Muslim culture

This was one of the points the pastor was trying to make*. There's a difference in the way the two religions recommend dealing with insults or harm. Christians turn the other cheek. Muslims react violently.

*As heard in his interview with Hannity last week.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating Koran burning, just relating a salient point.

18 posted on 09/12/2010 7:42:18 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Compact Theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro signature on Aug 13, 1968 passport renewal making a declaration about a family member previously included on her passport:

Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro Passport Renewal 1968 signature

Close up of declaration Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro signed off on:

Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro declaration 1968

Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) struck from his mother's passport because he is Soebarkah, Indonesian National, 1968:

soebarkah passport struck soetoro


25 posted on 09/12/2010 7:50:19 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (Soebarkah renounced his US Citizenship in 1968.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

IMHO...the Left..and the Rinocratic Party... intends to use Islam as the battering ram to break breakdown the First Amendment.


26 posted on 09/12/2010 7:51:53 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Just one more reason for me to believe this whole episode is one big "Reichstag Moment".
29 posted on 09/12/2010 7:53:56 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The last sentence can be explained by accepting that obama is a muslim.

Please pass the following on. I heard it first hand.

A co-worker of my wife’s said her ten year old son came home from school on Friday and said they had talked about 911 that day in class. During recess a ten year old muslim kid told him a man who had lost the lease on the Twin Towers had gotten mad and bombed the buildings.

This is what “moderate” muslims are teaching their children. This is what they’re being taught in those mosques we’re allowing them to build all over America. In only ten short years these ten year old kids will be TWENTY YEAR OLD TERRORISTS. Yet both parties tell us to be tolerant. In other words we’re being told to TOLERATE this crap. This country is doomed if a majority don’t wake up immediately!


30 posted on 09/12/2010 7:54:29 AM PDT by Terry Mross (If we don't try to stop this soon it will be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

thanks to the left (and sadly some dummies on the right) muslims now have veto power of our constitutional rights.

If exercising your constitutional rights makes muslimes mad, than you can’t do it.


36 posted on 09/12/2010 8:01:18 AM PDT by Cubs Fan (American Constitutional rights ARE NOT subject to muslim approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Does anyone have quotes from then Senator Obama when many were claiming that the release of Abu Garab (spelling) pictures would endanger our soldiers?

I don't know if he commented then or not, but it would be interesting to juxtapose those statements.

38 posted on 09/12/2010 8:04:02 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“security threat says something about the predominant Muslim culture, and President Obama’s assessment of that culture. “

Mr Obama has a skewed perception of Islam...

.....ever wonder why zero is popular with the muslims?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2585916/posts?page=27#27


39 posted on 09/12/2010 8:05:56 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson