Posted on 09/11/2010 9:41:54 PM PDT by roses of sharon
“I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating — none of which was true,” Gingrich continues.
. . .
That’s true only if you began examining him from the point of the presidential election and didn’t look back. His history, including his voting record, was anything but and the Stepford Media certainly wasn’t going to delve into that.
This is old news. There was an American Thinker article on this topic two years ago.
Of course...we all knew this 2 years ago!
***********
Yes. I remember this being discussed on the talk shows about 20 months ago.
How the mighty have fallen - and can’t get up.
I have been searching for that for months, but cannot remember the title!
********
IIRC there was an essay on the topic at American Thinker MANY months ago.
“This is old news. There was an American Thinker article on this topic two years ago.”
Yes, an earlier essay also by Ikenga.
I knew it was familiar. Greatest revelation in 6 years, eh?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2278969/posts?page=92
Welcome to the back of the class, Professor Gingrich. Glad you are keeping up with the conversation.
Exactly. Posted here a number of times and spot on.
Bump
Precisely my opinion. Gingrich is NOT, by any means, stupid. He just isn’t presidential material in the current market.
Could it be “The African Colonial”?
I read the article and what anti-colonials miss is that America was once a colony and her people built something out of nothing. We succeeded and certainly are not responsible for others not doing the same. Quite frankly, that shows Obama and his father are/were not deep thinkers.
I have known this sine day one. I will concede and say zero was born in the in America, but he is not American ....
Nice typing on my part ...
That is what I get for freeping on my phone ..
If you look at the continuous denial of reality, there has got to be a point where someone stands up and says that this is just factually insane.Sort of like the continuous state of denial regarding the huge mountain of evidence that AGW is pure fraud, pure politics and zero science? Sort of factually insane like, oh I don't know, Nancy Pelosi and the cap'n'crap-on-the-couch crowd?
(Just wondering.)
(I think Newt is desperate to get his credibility back. Which is laudable in the case of his correct criticisms of Imamobama... but sorry, Newt... I'll always remember that couch.)
Please explain to me WHY I should 'hate Newt's guts'.
Last I checked, today is Sept. 12, 2010. How and why is the Forbes article dated Sept. 27, 2010?
The Forbes article is the first one about the usurper’s mindset that makes sense to me:
“Colonialism today is a dead issue. No one cares about it except the man in the White House. He is the last anticolonial... instead of readying us for the challenge, our President is trapped in his father’s time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s.”
I don’t believe I made that statement.
I think it is a magazine article. The issues don’t come out daily.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.