Gingrich: Obama’s ‘Kenyan, anti-colonial’ worldview

National Review ^

[upsdriver]

It doesn't matter since most FReepers hate Gingrich's guts, and don't pay any attention to what he has to say anyway

I don't hate Gingrich. He was an on the cutting edge conservative way back in his career but all those years in Washington D.C. caused him to lose that edge. Gingrich has been saying and writing some good stuff lately. I think getting out of the DC environment has helped him. I also believe Sarah Palin is leading him around by the nose. Those insidethebeltway conservatives who are "growing" are following her lead.

[roses of sharon]

We cannot trust them to speak for us anymore.

Even Kraut dissed the town halls last summer as “rude”...then he said the tea parties would not amount to much.

To his credit he has since said he was wrong..but good grief, why is it when WE say something we are called kooks and extremists, and then years later find out we were right all along?

We are most definitely ON OUR OWN.

[boatbums]

That is a STUNNING article from D’Souza. I wonder how many people will actually read it who NEED to read it and realize that we must do everything we can to restore sanity and pride in our American way of life. I don't think it can ever be too late, but we must begin now and also in November to start the unraveling of the web of deception thrown over so many. Our country is too great to be destroyed by a badly formed son of a badly informed absent father. Obama is obviously not alone in his anti-colonial aspirations and these co-tyrants must also be exposed and brought down with him.

[azishot]

Ping.

“What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?” Gingrich asks.

“That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.”

[Siena Dreaming]

The IBD piece I am referring to is titled "Like Father, Like Son".

Here's the link:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=454957

[roses of sharon]

I remember saying here years ago that Obama was working to reduce the power of the US, on purpose. Same with Israel.

He WILL allow Iran to go nuclear, to balance Israeli power, and he will work to strengthen other countries, instead of America.

He is a confidence man, who sole purpose for this job is to raid our treasury, dismantle our military, give State secrets to our enemies, and remove the independent spirit from our citizens.

[meadsjn]

We Told You So

Not that it does any of us any good now, you stupid, stupid people.

[El Cid]

Re: 26

I don't disagree with a word you wrote.

I think D'Souza's article provides some background as to the 'why'.

[azishot]

Surely someone or some group had the responsibility to fully and completely background check Obama and make sure he was/is qualified to be America's leader.

Everyone kept passing the buck. No one felt that THEY were responsible. It's the media's job....it's the sec'y of state's job...it's the DNC, etc., etc.

Pick one. They'd all tell you it's up to *someone* else. I kept waiting for some *Swift Boat* type group to expose him. BO was untouchable because NO ONE wanted to be called racist.

[roses of sharon]

I agree.

It is all stunning really. Just think of the lies that must be told every single day...the dance he must do, to show the public this false face.

The massive PR campaign that must take place daily.

He could not do it without his propaganda arm, to me, the MSM remains our most dangerous obstacle to liberty.

We really cannot go on much longer without destroying them...removing them...beating them, or something.

[okie01]

He could not do it without his propaganda arm, to me, the MSM remains our most dangerous obstacle to liberty.

I have contended for a number of years now that there are three dire threats to our country and our children:

1. Radical Islamic terrorism
2. The anti-American left
3. The MSM

And, of these three, the most pernicious is the latter. For, without the MSM, the other two threats would have been defeated years ago.

[dread78645]

Was that IBD article titled....”Obama the African General”??

Obama, the African Colonial

[roses of sharon]

Yes that is it! Thank you so much, this article does sound much like Dinesh’s.

[RobinOfKingston]

Why wasn't Obama fully vetted, including his complete birth, education and personal background?

Because people so wanted to believe.

Almost. You answered from the perspective of people who voted for him. Many of whom were indeed duped. The question was, "Why wasn't he vetted?"

Because the people who could have (and perhaps did) vetted him wanted what he was about to deliver. The democrat party, and others further back in the shadows, are as evil, if not more so, than he is.

[El Cid]

He could not do it without his propaganda arm, to me, the MSM remains our most dangerous obstacle to liberty.

I agree again!

The CBSABCNBCPBSNYTWPost Consortium have been an active 5th Column in this Nation and they've done all they could to prop up communist leaning candidates - and utilized all their resources to destroy politicians that support the Constitution and smaller government.
President Obama and the Democrats have earned our disdain - but the Media consortium is repulsive. They pretend that they are 'unbiased' with their smiling faces - all the while stabbing the Nation in the back, and being the faithful soldiers of evil.

[Frank_2001]

And it would have been racist to question the credentials of a black man/sarcasm

[Frank_2001]

Hear, hear!!!:)

[roses of sharon]

I agree about Corsi, and always I value his input.

We don't have any real investigative reporters working for our side...I welcome anyone trying to contribute.

[LucyT]

Gingrich says that D’Souza has made a “stunning insight” into 0bama’s behavior — the “most profound insight I have read in the last six years about Barack 0bama.”

“What if [0bama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?” Gingrich asks. “That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.” - “This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president,” Gingrich tells us.

“I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating — none of which was true,” Gingrich continues. - “In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was is authentically dishonest.” (There; fixed it. )

. . . . Article and # 20.

[Thanks, azishot.]

Addendum.

Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308852/posts

[Dilbert San Diego]

And I remember that early on in the primary season in ‘08, someone said that the Clintons had something on Obama, but were reluctant to use it against him. Then there were reports that the Clintons didn’t want to run a negative campaign, and, that with Hillary’s negatives so high, that the Clintons introducing negativity into the campaign would backfire on them.

bottom line — the Clintons never used whatever it was they supposedly had on Obama. It may well have been information that he wasn’t born in this country, or that Barack Obama Senior wasn’t his real dad, or God knows what else.