To: JPG
Don't get me wrong, I'm still of the opinion that she is an outstanding person who would be one of the best choices to lead the battle against marxism at this point in time, but IMO she does not have to weigh in on every single controversy facing this country. In this case, I simply believe she is incorrect with her statement.
Sometimes, “No Comment” is the best answer of all, IMO.
27 posted on
09/11/2010 9:00:32 PM PDT by
Pox
(Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
To: Pox
Bah. Burning Korans is stupid. As is the mosque at ground zero. Sarah is spot on and as an American, can give an opinion, when asked, about every single controversy this country faces. Saying “No comment” is you wanting her to agree with you or not say anything at all.
29 posted on
09/11/2010 9:07:10 PM PDT by
smith288
(Peace at all costs gives you tyranny free of charge)
To: Pox
Absolutely NO way she could avoid a comment on this topic. Her ‘no comment’ would be shaped and twisted to mean everything negative the question posers would want it to mean. She handled this as well as could be expected by tying two separate actions together. She can't eat the whole moose in one bite but she can eat it one bite at a time.
30 posted on
09/11/2010 9:07:20 PM PDT by
JPG
(How much taxpayer $ did Mookie blow today?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson