As long as it’s legal to do so, by all means we better support the right to do it even if we vehemently disagree. You are really missing the point.
I have been doing some research on sharia law and the very first thing they do is to attack free speech. You do realize that the saudi bowing POtuS has submitted a resolution to the UN to stifle free speech agains islam right?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/10/us-consponsors-anti-free-speech-resolution-at-the-un.html
My neighbor down the street has the right to scream at his wife all he wants.
Does that mean I or other neighbors goad him on and say how "heroic" he is?
Millions of people do stupid things inside of the law. Doesn't mean they are right.
Citing Quran-Burning Threat, Islamic Body Wants U.N. to Outlaw Offenses Against Religion
Obamas UN Resolution to Stifle Free Speech on Islam
On October 1, 2009, the Obama administration in conjunction with the Egyptian government, introduced an anti-free speech measure to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC). It was adopted the next day without a vote.
The sooner that we can get a majority of people in Western Civilization to refuse the pretense that this EVIL is a "religion" of any sort, the sooner we can get people to stop protecting it and start fighting it. If a reasonable person is confronted with the tenets of sharia without that thin veneer of "religion" masking its true identity and purpose, they would immediately recoil at its horror.
Veneers are always used to make something look different; quite often in woodworking they are used to mask cheap underlays or unattractive species. They can make a plywood box appear to be constructed from Mahogany boards! Same thing here, the veneer of "religion" is simply masking a death cult that wants all of us dead (or at a minimum, serving them from a position of submission).
People need to stop using the word "religion" when referring to islam and need to stop referring to their crap sandwich of a book as a "sacred text."