Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron
Here they are...

Henderson v. Shinseki,
Thompson v. North American Stainless,
Gould v. United States, Harrington v. Richter,
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting,
Virginia Office for Protection and
Advocacy v. Stewart, and
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting
Premo v. Moore

All bet Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting seem pretty pedestrian. Chamber could be interesting as it has immigration enforcement implications.

16 posted on 09/10/2010 3:50:52 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand
Thanks again.

Wonder if any of the rest will be eligibility cases?

18 posted on 09/10/2010 3:53:25 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand
Thompson v. North American Stainless is a Title VII case. That might be interesting.

Does Title VII create a cause of action for third-party retaliation for persons who did not themselves engage in protect activity?

Gee, I wonder how Kagan would have opined there? /s

Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart also peaks my curiosity because it's a 11A case.

Issue: Whether the Eleventh Amendment categorically precludes an independent state agency from bringing an action in federal court against state officials for prospective injunctive relief to remedy a violation of federal law.

The rest of them are pretty inside baseball, and probably of not much interest to the casual observer.

25 posted on 09/10/2010 4:04:11 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson