It certainly isn't, but again, you misstate what I said. I only said a moral Christian does not land the first blow. He may well land the killing response and is particularly justified in doing so when his own person, property and family are directly and explicitly threatened. I am not about non-combativeness, just not about pre-emptive war. See my post a few above this for larger discussion on the point.
Ah Ha! I got ya!
I still differ a little though I think. I think the first strike by a society that has specifically expressed a desire to destroy the US is enough to at least destroy those that are active in that endeavor.
I am conflicted on what constitutes a threat to some degree but I believe that the threat as expressed in the Koran could be construed to be enough to demand that they strictly adhere to our laws.
Bottom line for me is that every Muslim who has threatened the US is fair target.