Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
Hey..if I'm a guy creating jobs....and I need to fund one spot with 4 million vs five spots...it stands to reason if the return on 5 justifies the investment, I will do so.

There is no return today. Says more about hidden regulatory and potential liability costs-of which your argument concerning bennies is a relevant part of. I happen to be an employer...10years ago with 17-currently with 5...and I only see potentially going lower.

The employer has a bullseye on their back.

21 posted on 09/12/2010 1:31:49 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: mo
"The employer has a bullseye on their back. "

And it was placed there by the government.

My original post was in support of people like you. The article's author makes it sound like the problem is with employers. The problem lies with the government: it created the mess with housing, the mess with credit, and now with hiring --- by making hiring too expensive for employers.

22 posted on 09/12/2010 1:37:32 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson