Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: topher
If judges want to legislate from the bench. Then they should be subject to the voters like legislators.
6 posted on 09/09/2010 2:28:21 PM PDT by PanzerKardinal (Some things are so idiotic only an intellectual would believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PanzerKardinal

Judges should have 2 year terms and so should senators.

Followed by two year prison terms.


20 posted on 09/09/2010 2:57:20 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PanzerKardinal
If judges want to legislate from the bench. Then they should be subject to the voters like legislators.

*****************************

Well said!

37 posted on 09/09/2010 3:29:03 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PanzerKardinal

If judges want to legislate from the bench. Then they should be subject to the voters like legislators.

Exactly. All over the nation right now the legal fraternity is acting with vengeance, that is with Ego, with vindictiveness, to prove they are the "law," exclusively.

But each and every one of us must live by, agree to, and hence understand, the law. Ignorance is, I believe, no excuse. Judges and lawyers, those who specialize in the "law" are every bit as corruptible and humanly fallible as anyone else on this forum or on this planet. It is demonstrated regularly.

Hence in an egalitarian society there can be NO better option than the choice of the people, no matter how flawed. In a court of "law" one can certainly pay to have a prostitute lawyer speak or research, and a Judge sit as a referee, but there can be no more fair and egalitarian judgement than by a jury of citizen peers. (Lawyers hated the OJ Simpson result). That's simply the way it humanly must be, and it is the ancient Greeks who first came to that conscious realization.

Sandra Day O'Conner here is simply showing her Ego and personal bigotry. This whole contemporary US scenario is exactly tantamount to the RC heirarchy before the Reformation; "they" were the ones to issue judgement, us commoners must not interpret the Latin, and it should not made accessible (by vernacular translation).

One of the major bigotries behind the orchestrated hate of GWB was that he was not a lawyer. And of course the United States has multiple times more lawyers per capita than any other country, and look at our Congress. They need to feed.

I agree that regular frequent election of Justices can also be problematic, but the Iowa amendment seems masterfully reasonable. I wish it also applied in the US Constitution. The Founders may have made a mistake here, but that is a different argument and concerns the moral/ideological background in which they operated.

Johnny Suntrade, the Suntrade Institute

46 posted on 09/09/2010 4:21:35 PM PDT by jnsun (The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson