Fig leaf? You're very amusing.
My aim, really, is to avoid unecessary conflagerations against those who may not be active combatants againsts us so that one, the enemy doesn't grow larger and more powerful, and two, so that our enemy can be isolated and dealt with.
Burning the Koran is more of a mastubatory act, though probably satisfying, but really doesn't weaken the Islamofscists in any real way.
Does burning the Koran set back Iranian nuclear development?
No.
Does burning the Koran prevent the Saudis' and other rich Muslim countries from funding terrorist operations?
No.
Does burning the Koran help kill Sharia loving Taliban fighters?
No.
Does burning Korans unite Americans against Muslim radicals?
No.
Does burning Korans magically turn mainstream journalists from communists and terrorist collaborators into human beings?
No.
Burning Korans does little except recruit more Muslim terrorists and give ammunition to the American Left so that they may further oppress Americans by claiming we are irrational as our history supposedly illustrates and separate us even further from our Constitutional rights.
Your support for the Islamofacist is palpable.. as is your skill in attempting make this a debate about a specific act.
Which of course I have not taken the bait and now you fail.
Either protected political speech is protected political speech or it is not..
If it is protected political speech to crap on the American Flag.. Desecrate Christian Symbols such as Portraying the Virgin Mary as a whore, the Christ as a Homosexual...Filling a jar with Urine and placing a cross in it..
Then for the Government to involve itself at the highest levels to prevent a similar offensive act of political speech when another group or Ideology is the target.
That itself an act of complicity, support or surrender to the group they have singled out to afford special privilege to.
When you have public officials from Fire Chiefs to the Executive Office trying to deny anyone their first Amendment Rights.. When you have the same media that insists on their unassailable right to print information such as Wikileaks has done jeopardizing the lives of Americans and our Allies in the same fashion.. but then state they will not cover a specific political act which arguably will have the same effect..
That is beyond Hypocrisy.. it is overt support for a very real and well funded enemy who very obviously has many friends in high places.
No doubt largely bought and paid for... and the question remains to Western Dhimmis/Traitors to the West.. by the word or month?
W