Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthfreedom
Ron Paul is against Roe v Wade. That makes him pro-life.

But he is not pr-life. If he was pro-life he would not have demanded that an underage girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get an abortion.
60 posted on 09/09/2010 3:06:30 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: John D

He is pro-life. You disagree about his vote I presume on something or other.

I’m using the accepted definition of pro-life, which is anti Roe v Wade.

Pro lifers disagree on various issues.

You’d like Rand’s positions.


61 posted on 09/09/2010 3:13:46 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson