Then this:
must be the same as the beheading of Daniel Pearl, right?
comedy club
Same as 9-11 except for the airplanes, right P.J.? Crowley is an idiot.
I’d say the same as Ground Zero mosque. Only President reacts differently... Should have said that they have a right to burn, but will not comment on the wisdom of it.
So does this mean that the Obama administration is going to declare war on Gainesville, Florida?
P.M.S. Crowley is a bigger disgrace.
>> with those bigots who attacked us on 9/11
Oh, we were attacked by bigots. I had the crazy thought they were terrorists.
Has the Obama Justice Department or the FBI taken to investigating those threats or are they referring the matter to the IRS to strip the church of their Tax Exempt status?
Oh geez.
Tell the feds to get bent. Burn 2000 korans. Burn 10000. Use them to light the fire at a pork barbecue.
Dayam! The things you see when you ain’t got yer bullwhip...
Then this:
must be the same as the beheading of Daniel Pearl, right?
P.J. Crowley appears to have come to the State Department as a man on a mission. Before joining the Obama Administration, Mr. Crowley was “Senior Fellow and Director of Homeland Security” at the Center for American Progress, the leftist public policy think-tank. The Center receives funding from such liberal advocates as financier George Soros and mortgage billionaires Herbert and Marion Sandler.
In February 2008, Mr. Crowley outlined his vision for a transformed approach to national security issues, in a position paper titled “Safe at Home: A National Security Strategy to Protect the American Homeland, the Real Central Front.” Examining the report, it’s not difficult to conclude that Mr. Crowley is a prime ideological architect of the Obama Administration’s national security strategy.
Mr. Crowley seems to have entered the State Department as an “agent of change,” and, so far, he appears to have been quite successful in helping to implement the ideas that he advocated in his position paper.
“Safe at Home” carries the sub-heading “Progressive Ideas for a Strong, Just, and Free America.” So even before the first page, Mr. Crowley makes clear the ideological bent of his report. The following are some of the more significant of Mr. Crowley’s “progressive ideas:”
http://yesbuthowever.com/another-obama-radical-9000012/
So burning 200 books is equivalent to burning alive 3,000 people? Clearly, these people can no longer be taken seriously.
Islam is a violent subjugating political cult. No wonder the left loves it.
Nothing these twerps do surprise me anymore.
Huh!
This is inspiring me so-o-o-o much, I want to rush out, buy a box of Korans and burn them in my driveway. Come to think of it, that is a great opportunity to roast some bratwurst!
Even before the Democratic nominee was chosen, Mr. Crowley was already calling upon President Bush’s successor to drop any use of the phrase “war on terror,” or any mention of the Islamic identity of the terrorists: “The next administration should discard the overly broad frame ‘global war on terror’ and ignore misleading slogans such as ‘Islamo-fascism.’”
He also appeared to be one of the first to not only call for the prosecution of suspected terrorists in civilian courts, but to advocate treating terrorism as a “criminal matter:” “U.S. courts have consistently demonstrated their ability to deal with complex terrorism cases, even those involving secret and sensitive information. Rather than being a constraint, treating terrorism as primarily a criminal matter in fair and transparent legal proceedings adds to our political legitimacy at the terrorists’ expense.”
Throughout his report, Mr. Crowley again and again blames America for the actions of our enemies: “Contrary to what President Bush has said, terrorism is directed in large part at what we do, not who we are.” In other words, we’re at fault for the actions of those who try to murder us. Mr. Crowley also stated this belief in a 2005 Center for American Progress lecture, in which he declared that our foes in the Muslim world “hate what we do, the influence we wield in the Middle East, the perception that we prop up autocratic governments that deny human rights, political expression and genuine opportunity for their people, all in pursuit of oil.”
So al-Qaeda is actually a “human rights” organization fighting for “political expression and genuine opportunity for their people.”
http://yesbuthowever.com/another-obama-radical-9000012/
I guess if they were planning on burning three thousand
muslims, it would be the same. But their not.
I bet he’d say burning a flag is patriotic too.
I used to believe liberals were well intentioned. I no longer do. What liberals are doing with regard to Islam in America is nothing short of evil.