Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jern

Ellmers is running in a district that gave President Bush 53% in 2000 and 54% in 2004, while Lawson is running in a district that gave President Bush 46% in 2000 and 44% in 2004. As for money, Ellmers had raised $184,000 as of the June 30 reporting deadline and has probably doubled that amount since then (she got a big boost when that video went up on YouTube of Etheridge accosting those college students in the middle of the street); Lawson had raised $152,000 by the June 30 deadline. I seriously doubt that Lawson could be running stronger than Ellmers right now.

I wish Mr. Lawson the best of luck in ridding our nation of David Price, and hope that his internal poll is correct, but I still think that it sounds too good to be true.


15 posted on 09/07/2010 4:16:28 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

lawson will get a higher % than elmers


19 posted on 09/07/2010 8:09:18 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson