I did read her response the other day. I just dont find it satisfactory. On FOX, she claimed no lien ever existed. That is apparently not true.
She also says she didnt know about a foreclosure notice on her house, but the court record shows she was personally served.
I understand that issues like these are less important to most folks around here than Castle’s record. I am just not convinced that the typical voter can dismiss this sort of thing and admittedly doubt that she will prevail in the primary.
Legal records are pretty damning.
I think the intelligent voters will look over the slate and see that Jesus is not among the choices, and realize that the others are all imperfect...