Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Plays Catch-Up on High-Speed Rail
The New York Times ^ | Sunday, September 5, 2010 | KATE GALBRAITH

Posted on 09/05/2010 12:29:40 PM PDT by Willie Green

AUSTIN, TEXAS — Spanish trains whisk passengers from Madrid to Barcelona in little more than two and one-half hours. Japan has bullet trains. China is building a vast network of high-speed rail routes, including the recently opened line between Guangzhou and Wuhan, which covers 1,070 kilometers at the world’s fastest average speed.

Soon, perhaps, the United States, with the world’s largest economy will also clamber on board. So far, the United States — in spite of or perhaps because of its vast size — has virtually no fast trains capable of moving swiftly enough over a long distance to compete with airplanes.

That could change over the next decade. President Barack Obama has declared high-speed rail to be a priority. He is interested, he has said, in “innovations that change the way we travel in America” through the creation of cleaner, energy-saving options. The economic stimulus package provided $8 billion toward the development of high-speed rail. Another $2.3 billion in government awards should be announced this autumn, using money from the budget.

Soon, the U.S. government will publish its first-ever national rail plan, laying out a vision for the future of freight and passenger rail. It is supposed to be released by Sept. 15, but a spokesman for the Federal Railroad Administration, Warren Flatau, said in an e-mail that Congress had recently requested an “additional level of specificity in the document,” and the agency is studying how to proceed to provide a thorough and timely report.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: ANGGAPO
Going into high gear on this idea would put lots of people back to work

Putting people to work on projects that consumers don't want is not only a waste of money, it is also a diversion of raw materials and capital from products that consumers do want.

Spending billions on rail will cause prices on those items to rise just as surely as building too many houses caused building materials to rocket in price. It will cause profitable businesses to have to compete with the unneeded rail for the capital goods that keep them in business.

There are a lot of knock-on consequences to the economy that the administration and the train-bugs don't realize, don't understand and probably don't care about.

21 posted on 09/05/2010 1:18:04 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
They are stupid inefficient and don’t come from where people are and don’t go to where want to go

Yep, exactly. Who is going to transport the people from their home to the rail station? Another train?

22 posted on 09/05/2010 1:20:08 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Mexico is the U.S. version of Hamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Beat me to the point that it seemed like a good idea in 1869. http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist1/rail.html


23 posted on 09/05/2010 1:22:07 PM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Train Wreck Pictures, Images and Photos
24 posted on 09/05/2010 1:24:58 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
Going into high gear on this idea would put lots of people back to work, that is, if that is what you really want to do.

Not really. Watch this. Pretty damn impressive . . . those Germans.

25 posted on 09/05/2010 1:29:07 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hopefully, Scott will win the Governor race in Florida and immediately deep 6 the stupid train between the Tampa area to Orlando. Time/motion studies have already determined at best, the time savings would be only 5 minutes but the cost would be far more considering having to rent a car or find other transportation to where exactly it was you were leaving from and where it was you were going.


26 posted on 09/05/2010 1:31:50 PM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

we could use high speed freight trains to move goods around the US faster but high speed passenger rail doesn’t have bang for the buck.


27 posted on 09/05/2010 1:34:36 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

How much private property will need to be seized by obamy in order for this to be built? How much private money will need to be seized by obamy in order for this to be built?


28 posted on 09/05/2010 1:36:41 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Soon, the U.S. government will publish its first-ever national rail plan, laying out a vision for the future of freight and passenger rail. It is supposed to be released by Sept. 15, but a spokesman for the Federal Railroad Administration, Warren Flatau, said in an e-mail that Congress had recently requested an “additional level of specificity in the document,” and the agency is studying how to proceed to provide a thorough and timely report.

We'll all be better off if the Feds converts the money that would be spent into $100 bills and start a big bonfire on the Capital Mall.

It would be a spectacle. Bread and circus style. But the landscape would not be disrupted, and we would not be importing rolling stock from outside the US and when the fire burns out it's over. There's no maintenance costs, with USPO like service and costs to operate.

Sure trains whisk people around Europe at high speed. Take for example the Paris to Strasburg run. It's 120e per person each way, or 480e for two per round trip. We rented a car for the same trip for 100e, including fuel and way more versatile.

Now in Italy, with large population centers within 150 miles of each other the trains work well, but they are cheap.

Same logic applies here, large population centers within close proximity, cheap fares. Come up a proposal that includes all this, then we'll listen.

29 posted on 09/05/2010 1:39:48 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Pure porn for machine design engineers like me. It really displays the difference in rail maintenance there than here as I have seen on lots of CSX lines.


30 posted on 09/05/2010 1:40:17 PM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
It will of course be built by Big Brother with tax dollars confiscated from unwilling “donors.” The only winners will be labor unions, already drooling at the prospect of cost overruns, work delays and every other trick in the book.

You say that like you think you're going to convince him its a bad thing. If there's one thing I know about people it's this: If it's their pet project, they don't care how much others have to be forced to pay for it.

31 posted on 09/05/2010 1:41:46 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Boondoggle


32 posted on 09/05/2010 1:46:11 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The myth of high speed rail in the US.

How much will it cost, Willie? How many trillions of dollars do we have to spend? Give a number - something you have NEVER done.

33 posted on 09/05/2010 1:51:07 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

My husband works for our local human cattle car authority here.

We don’t use it.


34 posted on 09/05/2010 2:06:03 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k
Same logic applies here, large population centers within close proximity, cheap fares. Come up a proposal that includes all this, then we'll listen.

Dallas/Fort Worth - Oklahoma City - Wichita

Charlotte - Raleigh

Chicago - Milwaukee - Madison

NYC - Montreal

Portland - Seattle - Vancouver

Baton Rouge - New Orleans

St Louis - Kansas City

Atlanta - Chattanooga - Nashville - Chicago

Chicago - St. Louis

Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dayton and Columbus

There's some others in Florida and California.

35 posted on 09/05/2010 2:19:32 PM PDT by Willie Green (Can you hear me NOW???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

We are not “behind” in the development of high-speed rail; to be “behind” infers that you are in the race, but if you don’t care to be in the race, you can’t be “behind”.


36 posted on 09/05/2010 2:30:08 PM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I work for a law firm in Cleveland, Ohio.

We also have offices in Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton.

I guarantee you that our lawyers would not use high-speed rail to go from office to office because of their tight schedules.

Waste of money.

As far as public transit in Cleveland, people have been riding for too cheap for too long.

37 posted on 09/05/2010 2:32:28 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I don’t enjoy public transportation for multiple reasons.

I want to be on my schedule.

I also don’t want to sit next or near anyone else for hours. I like my private space/time in my car where I can do want I want without having to worry about disturbing others.


38 posted on 09/05/2010 2:35:13 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
It would take ten dollar a gallon gas to pry Americans out of their cars and on to intercity trains. Not going to happen.

Bingo!

And even at $10/gallon gas, I would guess that Americans would negotiate with employers to reduce commuting days or cut back on spending in other areas in order to keep driving their cars. I know I would. I did the bus thing for a while in college, and after a few weeks I decided that being master of my own schedule was preferable. I also found that I enjoyed my coffee better during my commute without its aroma being mixed with the body odor and urine smells of strangers who looked like they would knife me if the voices in their head told them to (the bus brought me from the suburbs into a large city).
39 posted on 09/05/2010 2:40:06 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I guarantee you that our lawyers would not use high-speed rail to go from office to office because of their tight schedules.

While riding the train, the lawyers could do whatever it is they do on their laptops.
It would be a more productive use of their time than driving a car and having to focus all of their attention on traffic.

40 posted on 09/05/2010 2:40:41 PM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer – and some people polka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson