The Court did NOT contradict itself. It dealt with separate issues...separately.
Of course, you aren’t capable of reading paragraphs, let alone pages, so anything above a sentence fragment confuses you. But other COURTS can read paragraphs and pages, which is why you lose.
It isn’t my integrity at fault, but your reading comprehension.
It is obvious to anyone with 6th grade reading ability that the context of their discussion is meant to apply the Court’s findings to both Senator McCain and to President Obama. They begin that discussion with these words: “Second, the Plaintiffs argue that both President Barack Obama and Senator John McCain are not “natural born citizens” as required for qualification to be President under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution, and that therefore because neither person was consititutionally eligible to become President, “the Governor should (have been) prohibited by order of [the trial court]...from issuing any certificate of ascertainment, or any other certified statement, under the State Seal of the State of Indiana...” Appellants’ Appendix at 13.”
Everything that follows in that section of the Court’s decision is in reference to the above and applies directly to the eligibility of John McCain and Barack Obama as NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.
Edge119, being only semi-literate isn’t capable of comprehending those facts in evidence.
The court makes an errant argument that place of birth by itself establishes natural born citizenship, but failed to acknowledge that in the previous section that the Plaintiffs challenged Obama's place of birth, not just his father's citizenship. They simply omitted that part of the plaintiff's argument. Have some integrity, unlike the Hoosier hillbilly appeals court.