” but rather that it would be embarrassing to the Commander in Chief to be compelled to give evidence (of any kind) in such a proceeding. “
Embarrassment should not be a defense if
it’s pertinent to the issue.
It’s stunning that it’s come to this when
Barry could allay all doubts in a 1 minute phone call to Hawaii.
It’s jaw dropping that it didn’t happen in 08 when the questions were first raised by the Clinton campaign.
Commander in Chief George Bush or Ronald Reagan and heck, even a Bill Clinton would never in a million years sit back and allow any member of the Armed Forces
to have doubts about their Constitutional eligibility.
When the answer could so easily be given by
unsealing a single sheet of paper.
Of course, their documentation would never be sealed in the first place .
They would understand how toxic and deleterious it is to have the troops , even just one soldier ,
doubting a CinC’s eligibility
and they would be proud to voluntarily
substantiate their Constitutional bona fides.
Obama’s stonewalling and mocking attitude is extremely bizarre behavior by a Commander in Chief.
Could someone tell me if obama was actually vetted? And, if so, what goes on in the vetting process? My sister says it is impossible for him to NOT be vetted. Could this be true?
We can all wait for the full, and in-depth, report from the Lame Stream Media. I am sure they will be all over this statement by the judge. They will press hard on Gibbs to react. They will ask Obama about the judges quote at the next Press Conference. They will cover, gavel to gavel, the trail of the Officer in the U.S. Army in October.
NOT!!!!!!!