“The military has no valid reason for questioning the authority of it’s commander?”
Lind also says that authority stops with the Pentagon. So if the Pentagon accepts a usurper everyone else has to accept the usurper too, regardless of The Constitution.
“Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.”
“Lind also says that authority stops with the Pentagon. So if the Pentagon accepts a usurper everyone else has to accept the usurper too, regardless of The Constitution.”
So, let me get this straight. The “Pentagon” is the Commander in Chief not the President?
How in the world have we sunk so low to have judges like this?
(hanging head and silently weeping..........)