Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: whence911

Yep, a sorry state of affairs to be sure. The Secretary of State blew you off because the law made it possible to do so. I suspect that California is not a likely place to adopt a strict vetting requirement, but others states might and I hope that they do. Unfortunately, politicians on both sides are not too keen to do this.


263 posted on 09/05/2010 10:00:45 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316
Actually the law required her to vett the candidates for qualifications. She did nothing except take the forms from each party. In the past birth certificates were reviewed. We are in a culture of powerful people not having to jump the same hurdles as everyone else and people not being held accountable.
268 posted on 09/05/2010 11:00:26 AM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson