Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is beyolnd outrageous -- knowingly allowing terroristst to board a plane!

Why weren't THEY put through extra security and ARRESTED BEFORE boarding the flight!!!!

1 posted on 08/31/2010 9:23:53 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Innovative

Americans need to boycott the airlines for a week or so as part of a protest against airport security for refusing to profile islamics.

They need to stop playing with the lives of the innocent who board those planes. I agree with random checks, even of grandma, but it’s unbelievably stupid not also to profile.


49 posted on 08/31/2010 10:59:32 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Looks like all the fingernail clippers, nail files, scissors, and bottles of pepto bismol that were confiscated and all the grannys that were searched didn't do the trick. Perhaps we should start scrutinizing the profile of the people who are actually trying to kill us.
54 posted on 08/31/2010 11:27:53 AM PDT by Taggart_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The Obama administration and the MSM thinks we are complete idiots, if they expect us to believe their spin.

Here is something from another article:

“al Murisi also missed his flight to Washington due to the gate change and was sat next to al Soofi en route to Amsterdam — which may have been a coincidence.

Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezam al Murisi ... were detained in Amsterdam after al Soofi’s luggage ... was found to contain several cell phones taped together, a knife, a box cutter and a bottle of Pepto Bismol tied to a phone.

U.S. authorities, however, do not consider the two to be terrorists and may not face charges here.”

New information in terror case: U.S. had been checking for hijack attempts, Chicago airport changes could have led to arrests

http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2010/08/new_information_in_terror_case.html


55 posted on 08/31/2010 11:49:59 AM PDT by Innovative (Weakness is provocative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
I would be willing to bet that this "investigative purposes" bullsh!t was a lie.

More than likely there weren't any federal marshalls on the flight, only saying they were to cover their asses!

57 posted on 08/31/2010 12:10:30 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I feel sooooo safe knowing that our government is out there keeping vigilant watch over us to keep us safe.

I’ll sleep so much better tonight knowing that.


60 posted on 08/31/2010 12:19:06 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
"These two passengers have not been charged with any crime in the United States and we caution you against jumping to any conclusions," said a statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security Tuesday afternoon.
Maybe HS can send defense attorneys to the Netherlands to help these two poor misunderstood "passengers" out.
65 posted on 08/31/2010 12:59:32 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

“Why weren’t THEY put through extra security and ARRESTED BEFORE boarding the flight!!!! “

Because Bo Biden was not on the plane.
Because Sasha and Malik Obama were not on the plane.
Because Chelsea Clinton was not on the plane.
Because Pelosi and Reids kids were not on the plane.

Understand?


67 posted on 08/31/2010 1:13:28 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Nepolincompetano will still think the system works ...even after a plane goes down


70 posted on 08/31/2010 1:25:43 PM PDT by hattend (Like a termite to wood, Obama only wants to destroy - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

“on high alert” would explain the incident. Create a lot of “chatter” then run all the terror symbols in a nonillegal manner through the system. It would be a sort of reverse crying of wolf.


72 posted on 08/31/2010 2:14:51 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; All

If anyone is interested, you can go to al.com and see an interview with one of the suspected terrorists roommates in Tuscaloosa.


76 posted on 08/31/2010 3:33:44 PM PDT by kcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

“in part because they have learned the men’s abrupt change in flights resulted from them missing their original flight. “

Maybe missing their “original flight” was part of their plan?


87 posted on 09/01/2010 4:57:38 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog (You better HOPE you end up with a little CHANGE in your pocket after he's finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson