[Lurker]

Also, I didn’t see any indication that his guardians are forced to pay for his care out of their own funds.

Which means that I'm forced to pay for it by the Government. Thanks, sweetie. Real 'moral' of you.

[BykrBayb]

Which means that I'm forced to pay for it by the Government. Thanks, sweetie. Real 'moral' of you.

In other words...

"60,000 Reichsmark is what this person
suffering from hereditary defects costs
the community during his lifetime.
Fellow Germans, that is your money,
too. Read 'New People', the monthly
magazine of the Bureau for Race
Politics of the Nazi Party."

[netmilsmom]

>>Which means that I’m forced to pay for it by the Government. <<

So if a disabled person doesn’t have the money for his pneumonia treatment, should he be left to die? Would you be willing to pay for something to relieve his pain? Too costly? Or should we just drop him off at the Humane Society?

New show on Animal Planet. “Disabled Human Cops” They humanely euthanize, you know.

[little jeremiah]

In your opinion, who should decide what lives are worthy and what lives are not? ANd which live saving or promoting measures are worth doing for which people? Then who gets to decide how much insurance companies should pay out for which conditions? How about age cutoffs?

How about non-profit or hospitals run by relgious groups? Maybe the government should tell them who to keep alive and who to kill, as well?

Once you get into the “let’s kill those who should not live” the line changes and gets closer and closer to - you!