Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Republicans, an ’80 Déjà Vu?
NY Times ^ | August 28, 2010 | CARL HULSE

Posted on 08/28/2010 11:29:13 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: screaminsunshine; All
Eliminate a whole bunch of Government Agencies and reduce the size and scope of government. They are the problem not the solution.

The repubs who get elected this cycle need to treat their power as if they were going to do their last act and deed on earth for America.

Obama is here to try and destroy three things:
The Constitution.
Capitalism.
The Idea Of America.

He is somewhat succeeding and I believed has garnered plans to be a one term President to get these things done. Now, IF the repubs win, they can't give a tinker's damn about what anybody says, especially the BSM, and go forward to dismantle this Obama albatross!

In effect, be ONE TERMERS! They know they will give themselves self imposed limits by tearing down the liberal bastions of ruin. People will be pissed, and most likely vote them out the next cycle. However, in order for America to survive the repubs HAVE TO re-institute the idea of America embracing STANDARDS again. This is a MUST or America is gone.

21 posted on 08/29/2010 6:03:29 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

“But I don’t know if they will because the GOP or the RNC has not purposed a unified plan!”

The Contract for America was not rolled out until 6 weeks before the 1994 elections. There’s still time. The Dems have set such a low bar, there’s several no-brainer pledges all Republican candidates could make that won’t tie the party’s hands but will serve to remind people how outrageously Dems have governed:
1) We will not allow anyone who has violated federal tax laws to serve as chair of any committee in Congress.
2) We will not pass any legislation that increases taxes by more than $100 billion on a strict party-line vote.
3) We will never spend revenues dedicated to a special purpose, such as Social Security, Medicare and highway trust funds, on other purposes.
4) We will not allow any increase in the federal debt as a share of GDP.
5) We will abandon the use of earmarks so long as the Democrats agree to the same restriction.
6) We will never enact legislation requiring Americans to purchase something against their will.

Surely there are others, but I’ve tried to address the major issues that have most aroused the Tea Party to action.


22 posted on 08/29/2010 6:12:00 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
My point is put those with viable plans in the leadership positions.

Right! But the problem is it won't happen unless newbies understand running roughshod is they key. Nothing is going to get done if we elect career politicians...These people need an epiphany. Go in there and CLEAN HOUSE knowing they will be probably be voted out next term. Do you see this happening? I don't, but I hope I'm catastrophically wrong. Get in, tear down, and dismantle so much of it it will take the dems at least 50 years to build it back up if not more!

Obama knows it will take everything the repubs have right now just to put a dent in Obamacare, and that's if they win enough seats to effect anything.

23 posted on 08/29/2010 6:21:49 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

Like anyone I mentioned was a career politician? We now have the momentum and just like in racing, don’t overdrive it.


24 posted on 08/29/2010 6:25:12 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - Scott for FL Gov. - Miller AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DrC
You hit the nail on the head! Repubs come out with something like what you've suggested and I very much doubt there will be a dem left standing in Nov.

These newbies just need to go in there and burn that place down and restore it's integral idea again! They have to do it, or many people who are republicans or even vote republican will no longer be...Mark my words!

25 posted on 08/29/2010 6:28:17 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Spartan79

Too risky in Washington. Payback is a female dog.


26 posted on 08/29/2010 6:33:55 AM PDT by imfleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
Like anyone I mentioned was a career politician?

Look, you know what happens. They get there, they're wined and dined and then before you know it you start seeing their names hyphenated along with other liberals on some omnibus legislation.

Get in, burn that insipid place down knowing it might be the last political thing you ever do.

Rip it apart, and start to restore as it was intended...

27 posted on 08/29/2010 6:36:09 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"If we can get only one House, let it be the Senate. It's far more important."

How is the Senate more important than the House? All money is appropriated in the House. The House can starve the Obama entitlement programs.

28 posted on 08/29/2010 7:22:43 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

“Build for 2012...”

And don’t forget your state and local races and SCHOOL BOARDS. At least here in NJ and other dem infested states, I hope & pray the tea parties will stay active forever, of course, but at least through our state legislative elections next year.

We must keep this movement alive and grow it until we take this country back from the stinking liberal elitists who have brought it to the brink of ruin.

At every level, right down to dog catcher.


29 posted on 08/29/2010 7:45:14 AM PDT by jocon307 (Let them eat shrimp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Majorities are always better because you control committees, hearings and language in the laws much better.

But whatever power we have has to be exercised. letting RINOs call the shots will be self-defeating.


30 posted on 08/29/2010 11:09:09 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spartan79
I would add one more tactic the GOP should (but probably won’t) adopt with a slim majority or minority in the Senate. Obama’s most poisonous effect on our government, in the long term, may well be his hyper-liberal court appointees. As soon as the new congress is seated, no Obama appointees should be confirmed to any court in the federal judiciary. Not. One.
Republicans are going to pick up 10 or 11 senate seats, most likely. That will give them the slimmest majority of 51 or 52 seats.

As long as such a slim majority consists of Lindseed Graham, the Bobbsey Twins of Maine, Voinovich, Grassley, Scott Brown, and John McCain not in election mode, then it will be impossible to block 0bama's Marxist nominees without a filibuster. And Republicans could pull that off consistently with only 47 seats.

And speaking of Grassley, what's up with his election? He's polling below 50%. Has Iowa has their primary yet? Does he have a serious challenger? Why have we not seen a strong Tea Party movement to defeat him?
 
31 posted on 08/29/2010 11:57:08 AM PDT by counterpunch (Imam B'araq Hussein Mohammad 0bama, President of the 57 States of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I think taking the House this year is both more achievable and more important. If we get close in the Senate, but fall short of a majority, we can prevent a lot of damage through the wonder of "extended debate" or threats thereof.

Though we should avoid counting chickens which are still in the shell, it is hard not to look ahead to the 2012 Senate elections without happy anticipation. Democrats will be defending 23 seats, Republicans only 10. And look at the red state Dems who will be trying to get reelected: the two Nelsons (Bill in FL, Ben in NB); McCaskill (MO); Tester (MT); Conrad (ND); Brown (OH); Webb (VA). If an unpopular Obama is at the top of the Dem ticket, a big GOP year may be possible.

32 posted on 08/29/2010 12:03:51 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina ("Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." -- Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Iowa primaries are over. No serious opposition to Grassley.

http://iowaindependent.com/40936/poll-grassley-leading-conlin-55-35

U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, holds a commanding 20 percentage-point lead over his Democratic opponent, Roxanne Conlin, according to the latest poll from Rasmussen Reports.

Fifty-five percent of respondents said they would support Grassley this fall, compared to 35 percent for Conlin. In June, Grassley held a similar 54 to 37 lead. The poll found that 81 percent of Iowa voters regard Grassley as a conservative, while 50 percent describe Conlin as a liberal. Another 24 percent view her as a moderate. The survey was conducted Aug. 5 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percent.

During the Democratic primary, the Conlin campaign pointed to poll numbers that put her within 10 percentage points of Grassley. However, the company that produced those numbers — Research 2000 — has since drawn widespread criticism for allegedly fabricating stats.

In an interview with The Iowa Independent earlier this month, Conlin said the Research 2000 numbers were accurate in this race, saying, “My sense is that I’m still about that far from him.”

Grassley has never had a serious challenger for re-election, garnering at least 65 percent of the vote in each of his campaigns.


33 posted on 08/29/2010 12:04:44 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

It won’t consist of Voinovich because he’s retiring at the end of the year.


34 posted on 08/29/2010 3:46:36 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Grassley is one I envision will die in office.


35 posted on 08/29/2010 3:51:15 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

I thought he was retiring when his term expired. Is he retiring before then?


36 posted on 08/29/2010 3:52:36 PM PDT by counterpunch (Imam B'araq Hussein Mohammad 0bama, President of the 57 States of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
To name names, McConnell, Boehner and Steele must be gone from consideration on November 3rd. We can’t clean house with a dirty, dingy, and moldy mop.
I'd like to see McConnell replaced with Thune, Boehner replaced with Pence, Cornyn replaced by DeMint as chairman of the NRSC, and Steele replaced by, I dunno, a ham sandwich.
 
37 posted on 08/29/2010 3:59:42 PM PDT by counterpunch (Imam B'araq Hussein Mohammad 0bama, President of the 57 States of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
Grassley is one I envision will die in office.

Hehe

I know from hearing him in interviews that he does not believe in the constitutional restrictions on the federal government, and he's gotten more interested in pork as he's been longer in Washington, but he's a genuinely humble guy and I'd expect him to return to the farm before he needs adult diapers.

38 posted on 08/29/2010 4:14:36 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
And, the bad news is, look at what ya got!

Well, it doesn't say much for Bush that he looks good in comparison to Obama.

That doesn't make him "good", it makes him "less bad".

BFD. Some resume enhancer.

39 posted on 08/29/2010 5:16:53 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Steele replaced by, I dunno, a ham sandwich

Racist. Well, unless it is a Black Forest Ham sandwich.....

40 posted on 08/29/2010 5:18:44 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson