Fine by me, take a moral high road, you can live with the alternative. I am more pragmatic, I don’t want any one in office who supports anything that stumble bum does in DC.
I have one question you may wish to consider, if he was so guilty, why was he not indicted? Simply put, they did not have the evidence. By the time this case came up, the government had reinforced the laws to include charges based on “should have known”, making knowledge of what was going in a business a duty. Translation, the government had a less severe presumption to overcome.
Besides the 2A stance, I believe it was shown without refute McCollum believed and said we did not need an Arizona style law in Florida. Whether we do or not is debatable but what is not debateable is he said he was against it....then as soon as the mood of the populace became known, it became a priority for him to push for such a bill. Too little, too late and then to lie about what was his prior stance is almost Crist like. We don’t need an other political weasle.
if he was so guilty, why was he not indicted? Simply put, they did not have the evidence.
You ignore the 1.3 BILLION DOLLAR REASON. Had they been innocent, they would have refused to pay a 1.3 BILLION, thats BILLON WITH a B, the largest medicare fraud fine in the history of our country. Then we would have seen the evidence in court. But they weren’t innocent and choose to pay the largest fine in history. BECAUSE they agreed to pay the largest medicare fraud fine in history, Scott got to slink away with his tail between his legs and his ill gotten gains in the bank.
And you just voted for him…