Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

JOHN R. LOTT Jr.
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (download links for whole document at bottom of page)

September 1998

University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 60
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, Number 6, Part 1, pp. 1163-1198, December 1999

Abstract:
This paper examines the growth of government during this century as a result of giving women the right to vote. Using cross-sectional time-series data for 1870 to 1940, we examine state government expenditures and revenue as well as voting by U.S. House and Senate state delegations and the passage of a wide range of different state laws. Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise. Contrary to many recent suggestions, the gender gap is not something that has arisen since the 1970s, and it helps explain why American government started growing when it did.


35 posted on 08/26/2010 12:10:20 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Whatever the case may be, repealing the 19th Amendment won’t change a danged thing, since no state would dare to revoke womens suffrage.


38 posted on 08/26/2010 12:53:50 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Michelle Obama: the woman who ended "Diners, Drive-ins and Dives.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Well if we can convince everyone that the 14th amendment was never properly radiated then the 19th amendment becomes the new “The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States” as spoken of in the currently numbered Twenty-first Amendment(would become the 20th).

Thus ending the Federal constitutional requirement that women be given the right to vote. This wouldn’t solve the issue of State Constitutional enfranchisement but it would give us a laboratory in which to make the case in practice.

Kill 2 birds with 1 stone I say.

Of course we will still have to deal with the new 17th amendment and we will have to keep at least 13 states from ratifying either a new Womens vote amendment or a new 14th amendment.


42 posted on 08/26/2010 1:29:49 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson