Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillyBoy
You'll have to explain your rationale for claiming that anyone 'has' to favor repealing the 11th amendment if they oppose the 17th amendment. I simply don't see the connection.

You correctly point out that there are differences now between house and senate delegations (mostly due to gerrymandering), but miss the larger point that state governments have been transformed into powerless administrative provinces of the federal government, short of secession.

The 17th fails on its own merits - it's a century-old experiment, and its time to recognize it as a failure and end it before more damage is done.

12 posted on 08/25/2010 7:41:15 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Liberty1970

It’s not a failure. By your methods, all you do is put half (or more) of the Senate seats out of permanent reach of electing Republicans. Direct elections ensure that EVERY state has a shot at doing so, including even Massachusetts (Brown’s election would never have occurred with a 90% Democrat legislature).


15 posted on 08/25/2010 8:15:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson